Removing Watermarks with Partial Regeneration using Semantic Information
On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models
Abstract (arXiv)
As AI-generated imagery becomes ubiquitous, invisible watermarks have emerged as a primary line of defense for copyright and provenance. The newest watermarking schemes embed semantic signals - content-aware patterns that are designed to survive common image manipulations - yet their true robustness against adaptive adversaries remains under-explored. We expose a previously unreported vulnerability and introduce SemanticRegen, a three-stage, label-free attack that erases state-of-the-art semantic and invisible watermarks while leaving an image's apparent meaning intact. Our pipeline (i) uses a vision-language model to obtain fine-grained captions, (ii) extracts foreground masks with zero-shot segmentation, and (iii) inpaints only the background via an LLM-guided diffusion model, thereby preserving salient objects and style cues. Evaluated on 1,000 prompts across four watermarking systems - TreeRing, StegaStamp, StableSig, and DWT/DCT - SemanticRegen is the only method to defeat the semantic TreeRing watermark (p = 0.10 > 0.05) and reduces bit-accuracy below 0.75 for the remaining schemes, all while maintaining high perceptual quality (masked SSIM = 0.94 +/- 0.01). We further introduce masked SSIM (mSSIM) to quantify fidelity within foreground regions, showing that our attack achieves up to 12 percent higher mSSIM than prior diffusion-based attackers. These results highlight an urgent gap between current watermark defenses and the capabilities of adaptive, semantics-aware adversaries, underscoring the need for watermarking algorithms that are resilient to content-preserving regenerative attacks.
Key facts. Cited by 5 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 13 May 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 3.
5 papers.
- 2025Cryptanalysis of LDPC-Based Pseudorandom Error-Correcting Codescited by 1
- 2026Understanding Semantic Perturbations on In-Processing Generative Image Watermarkscited by 1
- 2025Embedding Trust at Scale: Physics-Aware Neural Watermarking for Secure and Verifiable Data Pipelinescited by 0
- 2026Position: Preventing AI-Generated CSAM Necessitates New Approaches to AI Safetycited by 0
- 2026Persistent Watermarking of Text-to-Image Modelscited by 0
- 2026Persistent Watermarking of Text-to-Image Models30 Sep 2026
- 2026Position: Preventing AI-Generated CSAM Necessitates New Approaches to AI Safety9 Jun 2026
- 2026Understanding Semantic Perturbations on In-Processing Generative Image Watermarks29 Mar 2026
- 2025Cryptanalysis of LDPC-Based Pseudorandom Error-Correcting Codes19 Dec 2025
- 2025Embedding Trust at Scale: Physics-Aware Neural Watermarking for Secure and Verifiable Data Pipelines22 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023Invisible Image Watermarks Are Provably Removable Using Generative AI
- 2025SEAL: Semantic Aware Image Watermarking
- 2026RAVEN: Erasing Invisible Watermarks via Novel View Synthesis
- 2026IRIS: Visual-Semantic Binding for Forgery-Resistant Watermarking of Diffusion Images
- 2026Breaking Semantic-Aware Watermarks via LLM-Guided Coherence-Preserving Semantic Injection
- 2026Semantic Watermarking for Malicious Image Manipulation Detection
- 2024Black-Box Forgery Attacks on Semantic Watermarks for Diffusion Models
- 2025IConMark: Robust Interpretable Concept-Based Watermark For AI Images