On the Superimposed Noise Accumulation Problem in Sequential Knowledge Editing of Large Language Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Sequential knowledge editing techniques aim to continuously update knowledge in large language models at low cost, preventing models from generating outdated or incorrect information. However, existing sequential editing methods suffer from a significant decline in editing success rates after long-term editing. Through theoretical analysis and experiments, our findings reveal that as the number of edits increases, the model's output increasingly deviates from the desired target, leading to a drop in editing success rates. We refer to this issue as the superimposed noise accumulation problem. Our further analysis demonstrates that the problem is related to the erroneous activation of irrelevant knowledge and conflicts between activated knowledge. Based on this analysis, a method named DeltaEdit is proposed that reduces conflicts between knowledge through dynamic orthogonal constraint strategies. Experiments show that DeltaEdit significantly reduces superimposed noise, achieving a 16.8% improvement in editing performance over the strongest baseline.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2025.
Builds on
27 of 38 references.
References · 27
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
- 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
- 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,854
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,609
- 2019Language Models as Knowledge Bases?cited by 1,922
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,307
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 976
- 2018Neural Network Acceptability Judgmentscited by 952
- 2020How Much Knowledge Can You Pack Into the Parameters of a Language Model?cited by 713
- 2023An Empirical Study of Catastrophic Forgetting in Large Language Models During Continual Fine-tuningcited by 622
15 more
- 2021Editing Factual Knowledge in Language Modelscited by 548
- 2021Fast Model Editing at Scalecited by 491
- 2022Memory-Based Model Editing at Scalecited by 443
- 2017Zero-Shot Relation Extraction via Reading Comprehensioncited by 425
- 2023Editing Large Language Models: Problems, Methods, and Opportunitiescited by 367
- 2021Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 361
- 2024AlphaEdit: Null-Space Constrained Knowledge Editing for Language Modelscited by 224
- 2021Training Networks in Null Space of Feature Covariance for Continual Learningcited by 139
- 2024Model Editing Harms General Abilities of Large Language Models: Regularization to the Rescuecited by 101
- 2024Model Editing at Scale leads to Gradual and Catastrophic Forgettingcited by 92
- 2025AnyEdit: Edit Any Knowledge Encoded in Language Modelscited by 74
- 2024The Butterfly Effect of Model Editing: Few Edits Can Trigger Large Language Models Collapsecited by 54
- 2024WilKE: Wise-Layer Knowledge Editor for Lifelong Knowledge Editingcited by 40
- 2024O-Edit: Orthogonal Subspace Editing for Language Model Sequential Editingcited by 8
- 2025MindBridge: Scalable and Cross-Model Knowledge Editing via Memory-Augmented Modalitycited by 6
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.