mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MulDimIF: A Multi-Dimensional Constraint Framework for Evaluating and Improving Instruction Following in Large Language Models

arXiv 2505.07591 ↗First posted 12 May 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 13

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Instruction following refers to the ability of large language models (LLMs) to generate outputs that satisfy all specified constraints. Existing research has primarily focused on constraint categories, offering limited evaluation dimensions and little guidance for improving instruction-following abilities. To address this gap, we introduce MulDimIF, a multi-dimensional constraint framework encompassing three constraint patterns, four constraint categories, and four difficulty levels. Based on this framework, we design a controllable instruction generation pipeline. Through constraint expansion, conflict detection, and instruction rewriting, we construct 9,106 code-verifiable samples. We evaluate 18 LLMs from six model families and find marked performance differences across constraint settings. For instance, average accuracy decreases from 80.82% at Level I to 36.76% at Level IV. Moreover, training with data generated by our framework significantly improves instruction following without compromising general performance. In-depth analysis indicates that these gains stem largely from parameter updates in attention modules, which strengthen constraint recognition and adherence. Code and data are available in https://github.com/Junjie-Ye/MulDimIF.

Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2025.

Builds on

22 of 35 references.

References · 22

  1. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  2. 2022Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackcited by 15,712
  3. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  4. 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
  5. 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 8,851
  6. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  7. 2023Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward Modelcited by 7,916
  8. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  9. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  10. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  11. 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
  12. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
10 more
  1. 2023The Rise and Potential of Large Language Model Based Agents: A Surveycited by 1,422
  2. 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,413
  3. 2023A Comprehensive Capability Analysis of GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 Series Modelscited by 244
  4. 2023Label Words are Anchors: An Information Flow Perspective for Understanding In-Context Learningcited by 235
  5. 2024Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Following with Multiple Constraints Compositioncited by 147
  6. 2024Multi-IF: Benchmarking LLMs on Multi-Turn and Multilingual Instructions Followingcited by 94
  7. 2024On the Multi-turn Instruction Following for Conversational Web Agentscited by 42
  8. 2024IOPO: Empowering LLMs with Complex Instruction Following via Input-Output Preference Optimizationcited by 30
  9. 2024CIF-Bench: A Chinese Instruction-Following Benchmark for Evaluating the Generalizability of Large Language Modelscited by 11
  10. 2024TL-Training: A Task-Feature-Based Framework for Training Large Language Models in Tool Usecited by 11

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 6; 2026: 7.

13 papers.

Sort:

By area: