How Do Companies Manage the Environmental Sustainability of AI? An Interview Study About Green AI Efforts and Regulations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
With the ever-growing adoption of artificial intelligence (AI), AI-based software and its negative impact on the environment are no longer negligible, and studying and mitigating this impact has become a critical area of research. However, it is currently unclear which role environmental sustainability plays during AI adoption in industry and how AI regulations influence Green AI practices and decision-making in industry. We therefore aim to investigate the Green AI perception and management of industry practitioners. To this end, we conducted a total of 11 interviews with participants from 10 different organizations that adopted AI-based software. The interviews explored three main themes: AI adoption, current efforts in mitigating the negative environmental impact of AI, and the influence of the EU AI Act and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). Our findings indicate that 9 of 11 participants prioritized business efficiency during AI adoption, with minimal consideration of environmental sustainability. Monitoring and mitigation of AI's environmental impact were very limited. Only one participant monitored negative environmental effects. Regarding applied mitigation practices, six participants reported no actions, with the others sporadically mentioning techniques like prompt engineering, relying on smaller models, or not overusing AI. Awareness and compliance with the EU AI Act are low, with only one participant reporting on its influence, while the CSRD drove sustainability reporting efforts primarily in larger companies. All in all, our findings reflect a lack of urgency and priority for sustainable AI among these companies. We suggest that current regulations are not very effective, which has implications for policymakers. Additionally, there is a need to raise industry awareness, but also to provide user-friendly techniques and tools for Green AI practices.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 12 May 2025.
Builds on
18 of 55 references.
References · 18
- 2019Green AIcited by 627
- 2021Carbon Emissions and Large Neural Network Trainingcited by 567
- 2019Quantifying the Carbon Emissions of Machine Learningcited by 521
- 2022Estimating the Carbon Footprint of BLOOM, a 176B Parameter Language Modelcited by 265
- 2020Towards the Systematic Reporting of the Energy and Carbon Footprints of Machine Learningcited by 249
- 2021Sustainable AI: Environmental Implications, Challenges and Opportunitiescited by 242
- 2023Power Hungry Processing: Watts Driving the Cost of AI Deployment?cited by 191
- 2016Designing Energy-Efficient Convolutional Neural Networks using Energy-Aware Pruningcited by 134
- 2022Measuring the Carbon Intensity of AI in Cloud Instancescited by 111
- 2023A Systematic Review of Green AIcited by 77
- 2023LLMCarbon: Modeling the end-to-end Carbon Footprint of Large Language Modelscited by 72
- 2022Eco2AI: carbon emissions tracking of machine learning models as the first step towards sustainable AIcited by 58
6 more
- 2020Sampling in Software Engineering Research: A Critical Review and Guidelinescited by 23
- 2023A Synthesis of Green Architectural Tactics for ML-Enabled Systemscited by 17
- 2023Uncovering Energy-Efficient Practices in Deep Learning Training: Preliminary Steps Towards Green AIcited by 16
- 2024Toward Sustainable GenAI using Generation Directives for Carbon-Friendly Large Language Model Inferencecited by 13
- 2022A Dempster-Shafer approach to trustworthy AI with application to fetal brain MRI segmentationcited by 11
- 2024A Controlled Experiment on the Energy Efficiency of the Source Code Generated by Code Llamacited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.