mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Navigating the Rashomon Effect: How Personalization Can Help Adjust Interpretable Machine Learning Models to Individual Users

arXiv 2505.07100 ↗First posted 11 May 2025cs.LG cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Rashomon effect describes the observation that in machine learning (ML) multiple models often achieve similar predictive performance while explaining the underlying relationships in different ways. This observation holds even for intrinsically interpretable models, such as Generalized Additive Models (GAMs), which offer users valuable insights into the model's behavior. Given the existence of multiple GAM configurations with similar predictive performance, a natural question is whether we can personalize these configurations based on users' needs for interpretability. In our study, we developed an approach to personalize models based on contextual bandits. In an online experiment with 108 users in a personalized treatment and a non-personalized control group, we found that personalization led to individualized rather than one-size-fits-all configurations. Despite these individual adjustments, the interpretability remained high across both groups, with users reporting a strong understanding of the models. Our research offers initial insights into the potential for personalizing interpretable ML.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 May 2025.

Builds on

17 of 41 references.

References · 17

  1. 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
  2. 2019Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AIcited by 1,552
  3. 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,416
  4. 2018All Models are Wrong, but Many are Useful: Learning a Variable's Importance by Studying an Entire Class of Prediction Models Simultaneouslycited by 373
  5. 2021Interpretable Machine Learning: Fundamental Principles and 10 Grand Challengescited by 367
  6. 2018Manipulating and Measuring Model Interpretabilitycited by 256
  7. 2020Questioning the AI: Informing Design Practices for Explainable AI User Experiencescited by 253
  8. 2019On the Existence of Simpler Machine Learning Modelscited by 89
  9. 2021The effectiveness of feature attribution methods and its correlation with automatic evaluation scorescited by 88
  10. 2022TalkToModel: Explaining Machine Learning Models with Interactive Natural Language Conversationscited by 66
  11. 2024Amazing Things Come From Having Many Good Modelscited by 55
  12. 2022A Meta-Analysis of the Utility of Explainable Artificial Intelligence in Human-AI Decision-Makingcited by 29
5 more
  1. 2022Striking a Balance: Reader Takeaways and Preferences when Integrating Text and Chartscited by 17
  2. 2024Challenging the Performance-Interpretability Trade-off: An Evaluation of Interpretable Machine Learning Modelscited by 10
  3. 2024Data Science with LLMs and Interpretable Modelscited by 8
  4. 2015Identifying a minimal class of models for high-dimensional datacited by 3
  5. 2025The Effect of Explainable AI-based Decision Support on Human Task Performance: A Meta-Analysiscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.