Engineering Risk-Aware, Security-by-Design Frameworks for Assurance of Large-Scale Autonomous AI Models
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As AI models scale to billions of parameters and operate with increasing autonomy, ensuring their safe, reliable operation demands engineering-grade security and assurance frameworks. This paper presents an enterprise-level, risk-aware, security-by-design approach for large-scale autonomous AI systems, integrating standardized threat metrics, adversarial hardening techniques, and real-time anomaly detection into every phase of the development lifecycle. We detail a unified pipeline - from design-time risk assessments and secure training protocols to continuous monitoring and automated audit logging - that delivers provable guarantees of model behavior under adversarial and operational stress. Case studies in national security, open-source model governance, and industrial automation demonstrate measurable reductions in vulnerability and compliance overhead. Finally, we advocate cross-sector collaboration - uniting engineering teams, standards bodies, and regulatory agencies - to institutionalize these technical safeguards within a resilient, end-to-end assurance ecosystem for the next generation of AI.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2025.
Builds on
22 of 47 references.
References · 22
- 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,456
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
- 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,304
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,888
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2017What Uncertainties Do We Need in Bayesian Deep Learning for Computer Vision?cited by 2,335
- 2014Unsupervised Domain Adaptation by Backpropagationcited by 1,906
10 more
- 2016Concrete Problems in AI Safetycited by 1,582
- 2017Towards A Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learningcited by 1,400
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2017Explainable Artificial Intelligence: Understanding, Visualizing and Interpreting Deep Learning Modelscited by 202
- 2025From Autonomous Agents to Integrated Systems, A New Paradigm: Orchestrated Distributed Intelligencecited by 11
- 2025Alignment, Agency and Autonomy in Frontier AI: A Systems Engineering Perspectivecited by 6
- 2025Transforming Cyber Defense: Harnessing Agentic and Frontier AI for Proactive, Ethical Threat Intelligencecited by 4
- 2025CyberSentinel: An Emergent Threat Detection System for AI Securitycited by 3
- 2025The Cyber Immune System: Harnessing Adversarial Forces for Security Resiliencecited by 3
- 2025Decoding the Black Box: Integrating Moral Imagination with Technical AI Governancecited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
3 papers.