mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

An Exploratory Analysis on the Explanatory Potential of Embedding-Based Measures of Semantic Transparency for Malay Word Recognition

arXiv 2505.05973 ↗First posted 9 May 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Studies of morphological processing have shown that semantic transparency is crucial for word recognition. Its computational operationalization is still under discussion. Our primary objectives are to explore embedding-based measures of semantic transparency, and assess their impact on reading. First, we explored the geometry of complex words in semantic space. To do so, we conducted a t-distributed Stochastic Neighbor Embedding clustering analysis on 4,226 Malay prefixed words. Several clusters were observed for complex words varied by their prefix class. Then, we derived five simple measures, and investigated whether they were significant predictors of lexical decision latencies. Two sets of Linear Discriminant Analyses were run in which the prefix of a word is predicted from either word embeddings or shift vectors (i.e., a vector subtraction of the base word from the derived word). The accuracy with which the model predicts the prefix of a word indicates the degree of transparency of the prefix. Three further measures were obtained by comparing embeddings between each word and all other words containing the same prefix (i.e., centroid), between each word and the shift from their base word, and between each word and the predicted word of the Functional Representations of Affixes in Compositional Semantic Space model. In a series of Generalized Additive Mixed Models, all measures predicted decision latencies after accounting for word frequency, word length, and morphological family size. The model that included the correlation between each word and their centroid as a predictor provided the best fit to the data.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 40 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 9 May 2025.

Builds on

2 of 40 references.

References · 2

  1. 2016Enriching Word Vectors with Subword Informationcited by 1,583
  2. 2021A note on the modeling of the effects of experimental time in psycholinguistic experimentscited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.