Exploring Convolutional Neural Networks for Rice Grain Classification: An Explainable AI Approach
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rice is an essential staple food worldwide that is important in promoting international trade, economic growth, and nutrition. Asian countries such as China, India, Pakistan, Thailand, Vietnam, and Indonesia are notable for their significant contribution to the cultivation and utilization of rice. These nations are also known for cultivating different rice grains, including short and long grains. These sizes are further classified as basmati, jasmine, kainat saila, ipsala, arborio, etc., catering to diverse culinary preferences and cultural traditions. For both local and international trade, inspecting and maintaining the quality of rice grains to satisfy customers and preserve a country's reputation is necessary. Manual quality check and classification is quite a laborious and time-consuming process. It is also highly prone to mistakes. Therefore, an automatic solution must be proposed for the effective and efficient classification of different varieties of rice grains. This research paper presents an automatic framework based on a convolutional neural network (CNN) for classifying different varieties of rice grains. We evaluated the proposed model based on performance metrics such as accuracy, recall, precision, and F1-Score. The CNN model underwent rigorous training and validation, achieving a remarkable accuracy rate and a perfect area under each class's Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. The confusion matrix analysis confirmed the model's effectiveness in distinguishing between the different rice varieties, indicating minimal misclassifications. Additionally, the integration of explainability techniques such as LIME (Local Interpretable Model-agnostic Explanations) and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) provided valuable insights into the model's decision-making process, revealing how specific features of the rice grains influenced classification outcomes.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 87 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 May 2025.
Builds on
9 of 87 references.
References · 9
- 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
- 2022Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,627
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,475
- 2016"Why Should I Trust You?": Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifiercited by 5,070
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,994
- 2014Deep Learning in Neural Networks: An Overviewcited by 770
- 2017Generative Adversarial Networks: An Overviewcited by 590
- 2018Fundamentals of Recurrent Neural Network (RNN) and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) Networkcited by 420
- 2023A Perspective on Explainable Artificial Intelligence Methods: SHAP and LIMEcited by 42
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 3.
3 papers.
- 2026Towards Automated Solar Panel Integrity: Hybrid Deep Feature Extraction for Advanced Surface Defect Identificationcited by 2
- 2026Efficient Adaptation of LLMs for Hate Speech Detection in Low-Resource Languages: A Comparative Study on Roman Urducited by 0
- 2026Integrating Triaxial IMU Sensors and Ensemble Learning for Effective Parkinson Disease Severity Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Efficient Adaptation of LLMs for Hate Speech Detection in Low-Resource Languages: A Comparative Study on Roman Urdu6 Aug 2026
- 2026Integrating Triaxial IMU Sensors and Ensemble Learning for Effective Parkinson Disease Severity Classification30 Jun 2026
- 2026Towards Automated Solar Panel Integrity: Hybrid Deep Feature Extraction for Advanced Surface Defect Identification13 Apr 2026