mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

RepSNet: A Nucleus Instance Segmentation model based on Boundary Regression and Structural Re-parameterization

arXiv 2505.05073 ↗First posted 8 May 2025eess.IV cs.CVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Pathological diagnosis is the gold standard for tumor diagnosis, and nucleus instance segmentation is a key step in digital pathology analysis and pathological diagnosis. However, the computational efficiency of the model and the treatment of overlapping targets are the major challenges in the studies of this problem. To this end, a neural network model RepSNet was designed based on a nucleus boundary regression and a structural re-parameterization scheme for segmenting and classifying the nuclei in H&E-stained histopathological images. First, RepSNet estimates the boundary position information (BPI) of the parent nucleus for each pixel. The BPI estimation incorporates the local information of the pixel and the contextual information of the parent nucleus. Then, the nucleus boundary is estimated by aggregating the BPIs from a series of pixels using a proposed boundary voting mechanism (BVM), and the instance segmentation results are computed from the estimated nucleus boundary using a connected component analysis procedure. The BVM intrinsically achieves a kind of synergistic belief enhancement among the BPIs from various pixels. Therefore, different from the methods available in literature that obtain nucleus boundaries based on a direct pixel recognition scheme, RepSNet computes its boundary decisions based on some guidances from macroscopic information using an integration mechanism. In addition, RepSNet employs a re-parametrizable encoder-decoder structure. This model can not only aggregate features from some receptive fields with various scales which helps segmentation accuracy improvement, but also reduce the parameter amount and computational burdens in the model inference phase through the structural re-parameterization technique. Extensive experiments demonstrated the superiorities of RepSNet compared to several typical benchmark models.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 32 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 8 May 2025.

Builds on

16 of 32 references.

References · 16

  1. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  2. 2015Fast R-CNNcited by 2,930
  3. 2018UNet++: A Nested U-Net Architecture for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,518
  4. 2018Panoptic Segmentationcited by 796
  5. 2021RepVGG: Making VGG-style ConvNets Great Againcited by 520
  6. 2018HoVer-Net: Simultaneous Segmentation and Classification of Nuclei in Multi-Tissue Histology Imagescited by 387
  7. 2016Gland Segmentation in Colon Histology Images: The GlaS Challenge Contestcited by 203
  8. 2018Cell Detection with Star-convex Polygonscited by 182
  9. 2021Lizard: A Large-Scale Dataset for Colonic Nuclear Instance Segmentation and Classificationcited by 89
  10. 2018MILD-Net: Minimal Information Loss Dilated Network for Gland Instance Segmentation in Colon Histology Imagescited by 87
  11. 2018Methods for Segmentation and Classification of Digital Microscopy Tissue Imagescited by 72
  12. 2019CIA-Net: Robust Nuclei Instance Segmentation with Contour-aware Information Aggregationcited by 54
4 more
  1. 2021CoNIC: Colon Nuclei Identification and Counting Challenge 2022cited by 44
  2. 2023CoNIC Challenge: Pushing the Frontiers of Nuclear Detection, Segmentation, Classification and Countingcited by 33
  3. 2020Multi-Task Learning in Histo-pathology for Widely Generalizable Modelcited by 4
  4. 2022A review of machine learning approaches, challenges and prospects for computational tumor pathologycited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 2.

2 papers.