UPMAD-Net: A Brain Tumor Segmentation Network with Uncertainty Guidance and Adaptive Multimodal Feature Fusion
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Background: Brain tumor segmentation has a significant impact on the diagnosis and treatment of brain tumors. Accurate brain tumor segmentation remains challenging due to their irregular shapes, vague boundaries, and high variability. Objective: We propose a brain tumor segmentation method that combines deep learning with prior knowledge derived from a region-growing algorithm. Methods: The proposed method utilizes a multi-scale feature fusion (MSFF) module and adaptive attention mechanisms (AAM) to extract multi-scale features and capture global contextual information. To enhance the model's robustness in low-confidence regions, the Monte Carlo Dropout (MC Dropout) strategy is employed for uncertainty estimation. Results: Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior performance on Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) datasets, significantly outperforming various state-of-the-art methods. On the BraTS2021 dataset, the test Dice scores are 89.18% for Enhancing Tumor (ET) segmentation, 93.67% for Whole Tumor (WT) segmentation, and 91.23% for Tumor Core (TC) segmentation. On the BraTS2019 validation set, the validation Dice scores are 87.43%, 90.92%, and 90.40% for ET, WT, and TC segmentation, respectively. Ablation studies further confirmed the contribution of each module to segmentation accuracy, indicating that each component played a vital role in overall performance improvement. Conclusion: This study proposed a novel 3D brain tumor segmentation network based on the U-Net architecture. By incorporating the prior knowledge and employing the uncertainty estimation method, the robustness and performance were improved. The code for the proposed method is available at https://github.com/chenzhao2023/UPMAD_Net_BrainSeg.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 6 May 2025.
Builds on
13 of 39 references.
References · 13
- 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,416
- 2022Swin UNETR: Swin Transformers for Semantic Segmentation of Brain Tumors in MRI Imagescited by 823
- 2021TransBTS: Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation Using Transformercited by 265
- 2018Exploring Uncertainty Measures in Deep Networks for Multiple Sclerosis Lesion Detection and Segmentationcited by 146
- 2019PHiSeg: Capturing Uncertainty in Medical Image Segmentationcited by 128
- 2019A Hierarchical Probabilistic U-Net for Modeling Multi-Scale Ambiguitiescited by 65
- 2021Latent Correlation Representation Learning for Brain Tumor Segmentation with Missing MRI Modalitiescited by 42
- 2020KiU-Net: Overcomplete Convolutional Architectures for Biomedical Image and Volumetric Segmentationcited by 32
- 20193D Dilated Multi-Fiber Network for Real-time Brain Tumor Segmentation in MRIcited by 28
- 2021QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Resultscited by 28
- 2020Brain tumor segmentation with self-ensembled, deeply-supervised 3D U-net neural networks: a BraTS 2020 challenge solutioncited by 20
- 2021Brain Tumor Segmentation and Survival Prediction using 3D Attention UNetcited by 19
Built on by
Not cited yet.