Plan-Driven Adaptive Bidding for First-Price Auctions with Budget Constraints under Nonstationarity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study budget pacing in repeated first-price auctions when an advertiser's private-value distributions change over time and the stationary competing-bid distribution is unknown. We ask how a feasible expenditure plan should enter online bid shading, learning, and hard budget control. We establish a plan-to-performance decomposition for a plan-driven projected-dual policy. The policy uses any feasible expenditure plan as a soft target, learns an unknown stationary competing-bid CDF from thresholds revealed after each auction, and enforces the campaign budget on every sample path. Against a distribution-informed expected-budget fluid benchmark, the uniform-plan reward gap is O(√ T)+O(mathcal WT), where mathcal WT measures heterogeneity in private-value distributions. With a supplied feasible plan, the global gap decomposes into a one-sided O(√T) fixed-plan execution term and a plan-mismatch term bounded by (b/2a)PlanError. The same analysis provides guarantees for strict and relaxed period-cap comparators, exact recovery of the global benchmark under a specific allowance vector, and separate lower bounds establishing the necessity of the temporal-heterogeneity and Plan Error terms. An upstream planner can translate forecasts or managerial priorities into a feasible spending trajectory, while the online controller adapts bids using realized thresholds and expenditures. The guarantee is modular: it evaluates the final normalized or projected plan through PlanError. A specific forecasting model can be linked to the guarantee by establishing how its primitive estimation errors propagate to this plan-quality metric.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2025.
Builds on
17 of 42 references.
References · 17
- 2013Non-stationary Stochastic Optimizationcited by 175
- 2013Bandits with Knapsackscited by 164
- 2020The Best of Many Worlds: Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problemscited by 58
- 2020Dual Mirror Descent for Online Allocation Problemscited by 52
- 2015Online learning in repeated auctionscited by 39
- 2020Learning to Bid Optimally and Efficiently in Adversarial First-price Auctionscited by 33
- 2020Online Stochastic Optimization with Wasserstein Based Non-stationaritycited by 25
- 2023Autobidders with Budget and ROI Constraints: Efficiency, Regret, and Pacing Dynamicscited by 20
- 2023Learning to Bid in Repeated First-Price Auctions with Budgetscited by 14
- 2013Real Time Bid Optimization with Smooth Budget Delivery in Online Advertisingcited by 13
- 2022No-regret Learning in Repeated First-Price Auctions with Budget Constraintscited by 9
- 2022Online Resource Allocation under Horizon Uncertaintycited by 9
5 more
- 2024No-Regret Algorithms in non-Truthful Auctions with Budget and ROI Constraintscited by 9
- 2023A Field Guide for Pacing Budget and ROS Constraintscited by 7
- 2021Contextual Standard Auctions with Budgets: Revenue Equivalence and Efficiency Guaranteescited by 5
- 2023Robust Budget Pacing with a Single Samplecited by 4
- 2023Interpretable Deep Learning for Forecasting Online Advertising Costs: Insights from the Competitive Bidding Landscapecited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.