mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Eye Movements as Indicators of Deception: A Machine Learning Approach

arXiv 2505.02649 ↗First posted 5 May 2025cs.HC cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Gaze may enhance the robustness of lie detectors but remains under-studied. This study evaluated the efficacy of AI models (using fixations, saccades, blinks, and pupil size) for detecting deception in Concealed Information Tests across two datasets. The first, collected with Eyelink 1000, contains gaze data from a computerized experiment where 87 participants revealed, concealed, or faked the value of a previously selected card. The second, collected with Pupil Neon, involved 36 participants performing a similar task but facing an experimenter. XGBoost achieved accuracies up to 74% in a binary classification task (Revealing vs. Concealing) and 49% in a more challenging three-classification task (Revealing vs. Concealing vs. Faking). Feature analysis identified saccade number, duration, amplitude, and maximum pupil size as the most important for deception prediction. These results demonstrate the feasibility of using gaze and AI to enhance lie detectors and encourage future research that may improve on this.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2025.

Builds on

3 of 39 references.

References · 3

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2019TabNet: Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learningcited by 648
  3. 2018On Human Predictions with Explanations and Predictions of Machine Learning Models: A Case Study on Deception Detectioncited by 159

Built on by

Not cited yet.