An End-to-End Model for Logits-Based Large Language Models Watermarking
On the map: LLM safety and security → Watermarking generated content and models
Abstract (arXiv)
The rise of LLMs has increased concerns over source tracing and copyright protection for AIGC, highlighting the need for advanced detection technologies. Passive detection methods usually face high false positives, while active watermarking techniques using logits or sampling manipulation offer more effective protection. Existing LLM watermarking methods, though effective on unaltered content, suffer significant performance drops when the text is modified and could introduce biases that degrade LLM performance in downstream tasks. These methods fail to achieve an optimal tradeoff between text quality and robustness, particularly due to the lack of end-to-end optimization of the encoder and decoder. In this paper, we introduce a novel end-to-end logits perturbation method for watermarking LLM-generated text. By jointly optimization, our approach achieves a better balance between quality and robustness. To address non-differentiable operations in the end-to-end training pipeline, we introduce an online prompting technique that leverages the on-the-fly LLM as a differentiable surrogate. Our method achieves superior robustness, outperforming distortion-free methods by 37-39% under paraphrasing and 17.2% on average, while maintaining text quality on par with these distortion-free methods in terms of text perplexity and downstream tasks. Our method can be easily generalized to different LLMs. Code is available at https://github.com/KahimWong/E2E-LLM-Watermark.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Watermarking generated content and models, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 29 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 May 2025.
Builds on
29 of 34 references.
Closest ancestors · 13
Same direction, newest first
- 2024MarkLLM: An Open-Source Toolkit for LLM Watermarking16 May
- 2024Watermark Stealing in Large Language Models29 Feb
- 2024Token-Specific Watermarking with Enhanced Detectability and Semantic Coherence for Large Language Models28 Feb
- 2023A Resilient and Accessible Distribution-Preserving Watermark for Large Language Models11 Oct
- 2023A Semantic Invariant Robust Watermark for Large Language Models10 Oct
- 2023Unbiased Watermark for Large Language Models22 Sep
- 2023An Unforgeable Publicly Verifiable Watermark for Large Language Models30 Jul
- 2023Robust Distortion-free Watermarks for Language Models28 Jul
- 2023Provable Robust Watermarking for AI-Generated Text30 Jun
- 2023On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language Models7 Jun
- 2023Who Wrote this Code? Watermarking for Code Generation24 May
- 2023Paraphrasing evades detectors of AI-generated text, but retrieval is an effective defense23 Mar
1 more
- 2023A Watermark for Large Language Models24 Jan
Other references · 16
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2022No Language Left Behind: Scaling Human-Centered Machine Translationcited by 1,312
- 2023DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability Curvaturecited by 726
- 2023How Good Are GPT Models at Machine Translation? A Comprehensive Evaluationcited by 348
- 2023LEVER: Learning to Verify Language-to-Code Generation with Executioncited by 239
- 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 166
- 2020Adversarial Watermarking Transformer: Towards Tracing Text Provenance with Data Hidingcited by 130
4 more
- 2023Factuality Challenges in the Era of Large Language Modelscited by 126
- 2019Real or Fake? Learning to Discriminate Machine from Human Generated Textcited by 99
- 2023Identifying and Mitigating the Security Risks of Generative AIcited by 91
- 2023Scaling Sentence Embeddings with Large Language Modelscited by 85
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
4 papers.
- 2025LLM-Text Watermarking based on Lagrange Interpolationcited by 1
- 2026SEED: Simple ViT and Evolving Harness for Explainable Text Forgery Detectioncited by 1
- 2026Beyond A Fixed Seal: Adaptive Stealing Watermark in Large Language Modelscited by 0
- 2026Synchronization-Free Algebraic Fingerprints for Large Language Models: From Autoregressive to Diffusion Modelscited by 0
- 2026Synchronization-Free Algebraic Fingerprints for Large Language Models: From Autoregressive to Diffusion Models18 Jul 2026
- 2026SEED: Simple ViT and Evolving Harness for Explainable Text Forgery Detection19 Jun 2026
- 2026Beyond A Fixed Seal: Adaptive Stealing Watermark in Large Language Models13 Apr 2026
- 2025LLM-Text Watermarking based on Lagrange Interpolation9 May 2025
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2024Theoretically Grounded Framework for LLM Watermarking: A Distribution-Adaptive Approach
- 2025PRO: Enabling Precise and Robust Text Watermark for Open-Source LLMs
- 2025Optimized Couplings for Watermarking Large Language Models
- 2024PostMark: A Robust Blackbox Watermark for Large Language Models
- 2024A Statistical Framework of Watermarks for Large Language Models: Pivot, Detection Efficiency and Optimal Rules
- 2025WaterSearch: Exploring Seed Pooling for Improving the Quality-Detectability Trade-off in LLM Watermarking
- 2025Yet Another Watermark for Large Language Models
- 2024WaterJudge: Quality-Detection Trade-off when Watermarking Large Language Models