mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SEval-Ex: A Statement-Level Framework for Explainable Summarization Evaluation

arXiv 2505.02235 ↗First posted 4 May 2025cs.CL cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Evaluating text summarization quality remains a critical challenge in Natural Language Processing. Current approaches face a trade-off between performance and interpretability. We present SEval-Ex, a framework that bridges this gap by decomposing summarization evaluation into atomic statements, enabling both high performance and explainability. SEval-Ex employs a two-stage pipeline: first extracting atomic statements from text source and summary using LLM, then a matching between generated statements. Unlike existing approaches that provide only summary-level scores, our method generates detailed evidence for its decisions through statement-level alignments. Experiments on the SummEval benchmark demonstrate that SEval-Ex achieves state-of-the-art performance with 0.580 correlation on consistency with human consistency judgments, surpassing GPT-4 based evaluators (0.521) while maintaining interpretability. Finally, our framework shows robustness against hallucination.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2025.

Builds on

20 of 23 references.

References · 20

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
  4. 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
  5. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  6. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  7. 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
  8. 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
  9. 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 674
  10. 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 584
  11. 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 418
  12. 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 418
8 more
  1. 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 407
  2. 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 378
  3. 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 361
  4. 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
  5. 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 244
  6. 2020SUPERT: Towards New Frontiers in Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Multi-Document Summarizationcited by 69
  7. 2023RewriteLM: An Instruction-Tuned Large Language Model for Text Rewritingcited by 67
  8. 2020Natural Language Inference in Context -- Investigating Contextual Reasoning over Long Textscited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.