SEval-Ex: A Statement-Level Framework for Explainable Summarization Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Evaluating text summarization quality remains a critical challenge in Natural Language Processing. Current approaches face a trade-off between performance and interpretability. We present SEval-Ex, a framework that bridges this gap by decomposing summarization evaluation into atomic statements, enabling both high performance and explainability. SEval-Ex employs a two-stage pipeline: first extracting atomic statements from text source and summary using LLM, then a matching between generated statements. Unlike existing approaches that provide only summary-level scores, our method generates detailed evidence for its decisions through statement-level alignments. Experiments on the SummEval benchmark demonstrate that SEval-Ex achieves state-of-the-art performance with 0.580 correlation on consistency with human consistency judgments, surpassing GPT-4 based evaluators (0.521) while maintaining interpretability. Finally, our framework shows robustness against hallucination.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 4 May 2025.
Builds on
20 of 23 references.
References · 20
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2019BERTScore: Evaluating Text Generation with BERTcited by 5,512
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2023A Survey on Hallucination in Large Language Models: Principles, Taxonomy, Challenges, and Open Questionscited by 1,601
- 2020SummEval: Re-evaluating Summarization Evaluationcited by 674
- 2019Evaluating the Factual Consistency of Abstractive Text Summarizationcited by 584
- 2019MoverScore: Text Generation Evaluating with Contextualized Embeddings and Earth Mover Distancecited by 418
- 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 418
8 more
- 2021SummaC: Re-Visiting NLI-based Models for Inconsistency Detection in Summarizationcited by 407
- 2020Asking and Answering Questions to Evaluate the Factual Consistency of Summariescited by 378
- 2023GPTScore: Evaluate as You Desirecited by 361
- 2022Towards a Unified Multi-Dimensional Evaluator for Text Generationcited by 264
- 2021QuestEval: Summarization Asks for Fact-based Evaluationcited by 244
- 2020SUPERT: Towards New Frontiers in Unsupervised Evaluation Metrics for Multi-Document Summarizationcited by 69
- 2023RewriteLM: An Instruction-Tuned Large Language Model for Text Rewritingcited by 67
- 2020Natural Language Inference in Context -- Investigating Contextual Reasoning over Long Textscited by 23
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.