Monitoring morphometric drift in lifelong learning segmentation of the spinal cord
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Morphometric measures derived from spinal cord segmentations can serve as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers in neurological diseases and injuries affecting the spinal cord. While robust, automatic segmentation methods to a wide variety of contrasts and pathologies have been developed over the past few years, whether their predictions are stable as the model is updated using new datasets has not been assessed. This is particularly important for deriving normative values from healthy participants. In this study, we present a spinal cord segmentation model trained on a multisite (n=75) dataset, including 9 different MRI contrasts and several spinal cord pathologies. We also introduce a lifelong learning framework to automatically monitor the morphometric drift as the model is updated using additional datasets. The framework is triggered by an automatic GitHub Actions workflow every time a new model is created, recording the morphometric values derived from the model's predictions over time. As a real-world application of the proposed framework, we employed the spinal cord segmentation model to update a recently-introduced normative database of healthy participants containing commonly used measures of spinal cord morphometry. Results showed that: (i) our model outperforms previous versions and pathology-specific models on challenging lumbar spinal cord cases, achieving an average Dice score of 0.95 ± 0.03; (ii) the automatic workflow for monitoring morphometric drift provides a quick feedback loop for developing future segmentation models; and (iii) the scaling factor required to update the database of morphometric measures is nearly constant among slices across the given vertebral levels, showing minimum drift between the current and previous versions of the model monitored by the framework. The code and model are open-source and accessible via Spinal Cord Toolbox v7.0.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 May 2025.
Builds on
16 of 65 references.
References · 16
- 2016V-Net: Fully Convolutional Neural Networks for Volumetric Medical Image Segmentationcited by 2,292
- 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
- 2024nnU-Net Revisited: A Call for Rigorous Validation in 3D Medical Image Segmentationcited by 240
- 2024A Note on Shumailov et al. (2024): `AI Models Collapse When Trained on Recursively Generated Data'cited by 115
- 2023Learning to Segment from Noisy Annotations: A Spatial Correction Approachcited by 17
- 2023Git-Theta: A Git Extension for Collaborative Development of Machine Learning Modelscited by 15
- 2018Automatic segmentation of the spinal cord and intramedullary multiple sclerosis lesions with convolutional neural networkscited by 14
- 2022Label fusion and training methods for reliable representation of inter-rater uncertaintycited by 13
- 2022An Introduction to Lifelong Supervised Learningcited by 12
- 2021Distilling effective supervision for robust medical image segmentation with noisy labelscited by 11
- 2022Lifelong and Continual Learning Dialogue Systemscited by 9
- 2022Segmentation of Multiple Sclerosis Lesions across Hospitals: Learn Continually or Train from Scratch?cited by 3
4 more
- 2023MLOps: A Step Forward to Enterprise Machine Learningcited by 2
- 2023Towards contrast-agnostic soft segmentation of the spinal cordcited by 2
- 2024Regulating radiology AI medical devices that evolve in their lifecyclecited by 2
- 2024SCIsegV2: A Universal Tool for Segmentation of Intramedullary Lesions in Spinal Cord Injurycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.