X-ray illicit object detection using hybrid CNN-transformer neural network architectures
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In the field of X-ray security applications, even the smallest details can significantly impact outcomes. Objects that are heavily occluded or intentionally concealed pose a great challenge for detection, whether by human observation or through advanced technological applications. While certain Deep Learning (DL) architectures demonstrate strong performance in processing local information, such as Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs), others excel in handling distant information, e.g., transformers. In X-ray security imaging the literature has been dominated by the use of CNN-based methods, while the integration of the two aforementioned leading architectures has not been sufficiently explored. In this paper, various hybrid CNN-transformer architectures are evaluated against a common CNN object detection baseline, namely YOLOv8. In particular, a CNN (HGNetV2) and a hybrid CNN-transformer (Next-ViT-S) backbone are combined with different CNN/transformer detection heads (YOLOv8 and RT-DETR). The resulting architectures are comparatively evaluated on three challenging public X-ray inspection datasets, namely EDS, HiXray, and PIDray. Interestingly, while the YOLOv8 detector with its default backbone (CSP-DarkNet53) is generally shown to be advantageous on the HiXray and PIDray datasets, when a domain distribution shift is incorporated in the X-ray images (as happens in the EDS datasets), hybrid CNN-transformer architectures exhibit increased robustness. Detailed comparative evaluation results, including object-level detection performance and object-size error analysis, demonstrate the strengths and weaknesses of each architectural combination and suggest guidelines for future research. The source code and network weights of the models employed in this study are available at https://github.com/jgenc/xray-comparative-evaluation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2025.
Builds on
18 of 35 references.
References · 18
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
- 2022DINO: DETR with Improved DeNoising Anchor Boxes for End-to-End Object Detectioncited by 1,306
- 2023DETRs Beat YOLOs on Real-time Object Detectioncited by 526
- 2022TinyViT: Fast Pretraining Distillation for Small Vision Transformerscited by 232
- 2021Sparse DETR: Efficient End-to-End Object Detection with Learnable Sparsitycited by 98
- 2022Next-ViT: Next Generation Vision Transformer for Efficient Deployment in Realistic Industrial Scenarioscited by 65
- 2020Occluded Prohibited Items Detection: an X-ray Security Inspection Benchmark and De-occlusion Attention Modulecited by 39
- 2023A survey of the Vision Transformers and their CNN-Transformer based Variantscited by 33
- 2021Towards Real-World Prohibited Item Detection: A Large-Scale X-ray Benchmarkcited by 31
- 2021Towards Real-world X-ray Security Inspection: A High-Quality Benchmark and Lateral Inhibition Module for Prohibited Items Detectioncited by 30
6 more
- 2022PIDray: A Large-scale X-ray Benchmark for Real-World Prohibited Item Detectioncited by 17
- 2024Self-supervised visual learning in the low-data regime: a comparative evaluationcited by 11
- 2022Computer Vision on X-ray Data in Industrial Production and Security Applications: A Comprehensive Surveycited by 6
- 2023Illicit item detection in X-ray images for security applicationscited by 4
- 2023Visual inspection for illicit items in X-ray images using Deep Learningcited by 3
- 2024Illicit object detection in X-ray images using Vision Transformerscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.