On the retraining frequency of global models in retail demand forecasting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In an era of increasing computational capabilities and growing environmental consciousness, organizations face a critical challenge in balancing the accuracy of forecasting models with computational efficiency and sustainability. Global forecasting models, lowering the computational time, have gained significant attention over the years. However, the common practice of retraining these models with new observations raises important questions about the costs of forecasting. Using ten different machine learning and deep learning models, we analyzed various retraining scenarios, ranging from continuous updates to no retraining at all, across two large retail demand datasets. We showed that less frequent retraining strategies maintain the forecast accuracy while reducing the computational costs, providing a more sustainable approach to large-scale forecasting. We also found that machine learning models are a marginally better choice to reduce the costs of forecasting when coupled with less frequent model retraining strategies as the frequency of the data increases. Our findings challenge the conventional belief that frequent retraining is essential for maintaining forecasting accuracy. Instead, periodic retraining offers a good balance between predictive performance and efficiency, both in the case of point and probabilistic forecasting. These insights provide actionable guidelines for organizations seeking to optimize forecasting pipelines while reducing costs and energy consumption.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 60 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 May 2025.
Builds on
25 of 60 references.
References · 25
- 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,722
- 2019Energy and Policy Considerations for Deep Learning in NLPcited by 1,254
- 2019N-BEATS: Neural basis expansion analysis for interpretable time series forecastingcited by 753
- 2019Green AIcited by 627
- 2021Tabular Data: Deep Learning is Not All You Needcited by 535
- 2021Monash Time Series Forecasting Archivecited by 267
- 2019Think Globally, Act Locally: A Deep Neural Network Approach to High-Dimensional Time Series Forecastingcited by 161
- 2020Principles and Algorithms for Forecasting Groups of Time Series: Locality and Globalitycited by 70
- 2021Neural basis expansion analysis with exogenous variables: Forecasting electricity prices with NBEATSxcited by 64
- 2022Forecast Evaluation for Data Scientists: Common Pitfalls and Best Practicescited by 55
13 more
- 2022Criteria for Classifying Forecasting Methodscited by 48
- 2024A Closer Look at Deep Learning Methods on Tabular Datasetscited by 41
- 2020Forecasting: theory and practicecited by 36
- 2020Improving the Accuracy of Global Forecasting Models using Time Series Data Augmentationcited by 31
- 2020Global Models for Time Series Forecasting: A Simulation Studycited by 21
- 2020Ensembles of Localised Models for Time Series Forecastingcited by 20
- 2019Sales Demand Forecast in E-commerce using a Long Short-Term Memory Neural Network Methodologycited by 18
- 2024A Comprehensive Benchmark of Machine and Deep Learning Across Diverse Tabular Datasetscited by 15
- 2023Accuracy is not the only Metric that matters: Estimating the Energy Consumption of Deep Learning Modelscited by 9
- 2021Hierarchical forecasting with a top-down alignment of independent level forecastscited by 6
- 2021Wielding Occam's razor: Fast and frugal retail forecastingcited by 4
- 2021LoMEF: A Framework to Produce Local Explanations for Global Model Time Series Forecastscited by 3
- 2022SETAR-Tree: A Novel and Accurate Tree Algorithm for Global Time Series Forecastingcited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.