mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Robust and Generalizable Gerchberg Saxton based Physics Inspired Neural Networks for Computer Generated Holography: A Sensitivity Analysis Framework

arXiv 2505.00220 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2025cs.CV physics.opticscited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Computer-generated holography (CGH) enables applications in holographic augmented reality (AR), 3D displays, systems neuroscience, and optical trapping. The fundamental challenge in CGH is solving the inverse problem of phase retrieval from intensity measurements. Physics-inspired neural networks (PINNs), especially Gerchberg-Saxton-based PINNs (GS-PINNs), have advanced phase retrieval capabilities. However, their performance strongly depends on forward models (FMs) and their hyperparameters (FMHs), limiting generalization, complicating benchmarking, and hindering hardware optimization. We present a systematic sensitivity analysis framework based on Saltelli's extension of Sobol's method to quantify FMH impacts on GS-PINN performance. Our analysis demonstrates that SLM pixel-resolution is the primary factor affecting neural network sensitivity, followed by pixel-pitch, propagation distance, and wavelength. Free space propagation forward models demonstrate superior neural network performance compared to Fourier holography, providing enhanced parameterization and generalization. We introduce a composite evaluation metric combining performance consistency, generalization capability, and hyperparameter perturbation resilience, establishing a unified benchmarking standard across CGH configurations. Our research connects physics-inspired deep learning theory with practical CGH implementations through concrete guidelines for forward model selection, neural network architecture, and performance evaluation. Our contributions advance the development of robust, interpretable, and generalizable neural networks for diverse holographic applications, supporting evidence-based decisions in CGH research and implementation.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2025.

Builds on

12 of 65 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019Algorithm Unrolling: Interpretable, Efficient Deep Learning for Signal and Image Processingcited by 421
  2. 2020Model-Based Deep Learningcited by 141
  3. 2021What I Cannot Predict, I Do Not Understand: A Human-Centered Evaluation Framework for Explainability Methodscited by 98
  4. 2021Look at the Variance! Efficient Black-box Explanations with Sobol-based Sensitivity Analysiscited by 65
  5. 2022Don't Lie to Me! Robust and Efficient Explainability with Verified Perturbation Analysiscited by 38
  6. 2022Making Sense of Dependence: Efficient Black-box Explanations Using Dependence Measurecited by 33
  7. 2023On the use of deep learning for phase recoverycited by 20
  8. 2022Fourier Imager Network (FIN): A deep neural network for hologram reconstruction with superior external generalizationcited by 18
  9. 2022Self-supervised learning of hologram reconstruction using physics consistencycited by 14
  10. 2013Global Sensitivity Analysis with Dependence Measurescited by 12
  11. 2022Goal-Oriented Sensitivity Analysis of Hyperparameters in Deep Learningcited by 4
  12. 2023Fast non-iterative algorithm for 3D point-cloud holographycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.