Comparison of Different Deep Neural Network Models in the Cultural Heritage Domain
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The integration of computer vision and deep learning is an essential part of documenting and preserving cultural heritage, as well as improving visitor experiences. In recent years, two deep learning paradigms have been established in the field of computer vision: convolutional neural networks and transformer architectures. The present study aims to make a comparative analysis of some representatives of these two techniques of their ability to transfer knowledge from generic dataset, such as ImageNet, to cultural heritage specific tasks. The results of testing examples of the architectures VGG, ResNet, DenseNet, Visual Transformer, Swin Transformer, and PoolFormer, showed that DenseNet is the best in terms of efficiency-computability ratio.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2025.
Builds on
9 of 15 references.
References · 9
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,364
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,139
- 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,720
- 2020Efficient Transformers: A Surveycited by 790
- 2021MetaFormer Is Actually What You Need for Visioncited by 524
- 2021The Devil is in the Detail: Simple Tricks Improve Systematic Generalization of Transformerscited by 117
- 2022Convolutional Neural Generative Coding: Scaling Predictive Coding to Natural Imagescited by 10
Built on by
Not cited yet.