mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Towards Space Group Determination from EBSD Patterns: The Role of Deep Learning and High-throughput Dynamical Simulations

arXiv 2504.21331 ↗First posted 30 Apr 2025cond-mat.mtrl-sci cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The design of novel materials hinges on the understanding of structure-property relationships. However, in recent times, our capability to synthesize a large number of materials has outpaced our speed at characterizing them. While the overall chemical constituents can be readily known during synthesis, the structural evolution and characterization of newly synthesized samples remains a bottleneck for the ultimate goal of high throughput nanomaterials discovery. Thus, scalable methods for crystal symmetry determination that can analyze a large volume of material samples within a short time-frame are especially needed. Kikuchi diffraction in the SEM is a promising technique for this due to its sensitivity to dynamical scattering, which may provide information beyond just the seven crystal systems and fourteen Bravais lattices. After diffraction patterns are collected from material samples, deep learning methods may be able to classify the space group symmetries using the patterns as input, which paired with the elemental composition, would help enable the determination of the crystal structure. To investigate the feasibility of this solution, neural networks were trained to predict the space group type of background corrected EBSD patterns. Our networks were first trained and tested on an artificial dataset of EBSD patterns of 5,148 different cubic phases, created through physics-based dynamical simulations. Next, Maximum Classifier Discrepancy, an unsupervised deep learning-based domain adaptation method, was utilized to train neural networks to make predictions for experimental EBSD patterns. We introduce a relabeling scheme, which enables our models to achieve accuracy scores higher than 90% on simulated and experimental data, suggesting that neural networks are capable of making predictions of crystal symmetry from an EBSD pattern.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 85 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Apr 2025.

Builds on

10 of 85 references.

References · 10

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2017Grad-CAM++: Improved Visual Explanations for Deep Convolutional Networkscited by 939
  3. 2021Domain Generalization: A Surveycited by 764
  4. 2017Maximum Classifier Discrepancy for Unsupervised Domain Adaptationcited by 683
  5. 2020Domain Adaptive Ensemble Learningcited by 156
  6. 2022Deep Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: A Review of Recent Advances and Perspectivescited by 98
  7. 2019Paradigm shift in electron-based crystallography via machine learningcited by 12
  8. 2020Identification of Crystal Symmetry from Noisy Diffraction Patterns by A Shape Analysis and Deep Learningcited by 6
  9. 2023Q-RBSA: High-Resolution 3D EBSD Map Generation Using An Efficient Quaternion Transformer Networkcited by 6
  10. 2021Deep Learning for automated phase segmentation in EBSD maps. A case study in Dual Phase steel microstructurescited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.