Evaluation and Verification of Physics-Informed Neural Models of the Grad-Shafranov Equation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Our contributions are motivated by fusion reactors that rely on maintaining magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equilibrium, where the balance between plasma pressure and confining magnetic fields is required for stable operation. In axisymmetric tokamak reactors in particular, and under the assumption of toroidal symmetry, this equilibrium can be mathematically modelled using the Grad-Shafranov Equation (GSE). Recent works have demonstrated the potential of using Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) to model the GSE. Existing studies did not examine realistic scenarios in which a single network generalizes to a variety of boundary conditions. Addressing that limitation, we evaluate a PINN architecture that incorporates boundary points as network inputs. Additionally, we compare PINN model accuracy and inference speeds with a Fourier Neural Operator (FNO) model. Finding the PINN model to be the most performant, and accurate in our setting, we use the network verification tool Marabou to perform a range of verification tasks. Although we find some discrepancies between evaluations of the networks natively in PyTorch, compared to via Marabou, we are able to demonstrate useful and practical verification workflows. Our study is the first investigation of verification of such networks.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2025.
Builds on
14 of 31 references.
References · 14
- 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,326
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,806
- 2016Adversarial Machine Learning at Scalecited by 934
- 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
- 2021Neural Operator: Learning Maps Between Function Spacescited by 413
- 2020Fast and Complete: Enabling Complete Neural Network Verification with Rapid and Massively Parallel Incomplete Verifierscited by 183
- 2018Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networkscited by 165
- 2022General Cutting Planes for Bound-Propagation-Based Neural Network Verificationcited by 102
- 2021Introduction to Neural Network Verificationcited by 63
- 2024Neural Network Verification with Branch-and-Bound for General Nonlinearitiescited by 47
- 2020Scaling Polyhedral Neural Network Verification on GPUscited by 43
- 2019Deep neural network Grad-Shafranov solver constrained with measured magnetic signalscited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.