mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Hidden Risks of LLM-Generated Web Application Code: A Security-Centric Evaluation of Code Generation Capabilities in Large Language Models

arXiv 2504.20612 ↗First posted 29 Apr 2025cs.CR cs.AI cs.ETcited by 7

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid advancement of Large Language Models (LLMs) has enhanced software development processes, minimizing the time and effort required for coding and enhancing developer productivity. However, despite their potential benefits, code generated by LLMs has been shown to generate insecure code in controlled environments, raising critical concerns about their reliability and security in real-world applications. This paper uses predefined security parameters to evaluate the security compliance of LLM-generated code across multiple models, such as ChatGPT, DeepSeek, Claude, Gemini and Grok. The analysis reveals critical vulnerabilities in authentication mechanisms, session management, input validation and HTTP security headers. Although some models implement security measures to a limited extent, none fully align with industry best practices, highlighting the associated risks in automated software development. Our findings underscore that human expertise is crucial to ensure secure software deployment or review of LLM-generated code. Also, there is a need for robust security assessment frameworks to enhance the reliability of LLM-generated code in real-world applications.

Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2025.

Builds on

3 of 14 references.

References · 3

  1. 2022Do Users Write More Insecure Code with AI Assistants?cited by 192
  2. 2023How Secure is Code Generated by ChatGPT?cited by 81
  3. 2024LLMs in Web Development: Evaluating LLM-Generated PHP Code Unveiling Vulnerabilities and Limitationscited by 22

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 3.

7 papers.