On Psychology of AI -- Does Primacy Effect Affect ChatGPT and Other LLMs?
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the primacy effect in three commercial LLMs: ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude. We do this by repurposing the famous experiment Asch (1946) conducted using human subjects. The experiment is simple, given two candidates with equal descriptions which one is preferred if one description has positive adjectives first before negative ones and another description has negative adjectives followed by positive ones. We test this in two experiments. In one experiment, LLMs are given both candidates simultaneously in the same prompt, and in another experiment, LLMs are given both candidates separately. We test all the models with 200 candidate pairs. We found that, in the first experiment, ChatGPT preferred the candidate with positive adjectives listed first, while Gemini preferred both equally often. Claude refused to make a choice. In the second experiment, ChatGPT and Claude were most likely to rank both candidates equally. In the case where they did not give an equal rating, both showed a clear preference to a candidate that had negative adjectives listed first. Gemini was most likely to prefer a candidate with negative adjectives listed first.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 1 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Apr 2025.
Builds on
1 of 10 references.
References · 1
- 2024Serial Position Effects of Large Language Modelscited by 30
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.