Enhancing Systematic Reviews with Large Language Models: Using GPT-4 and Kimi
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This research delved into GPT-4 and Kimi, two Large Language Models (LLMs), for systematic reviews. We evaluated their performance by comparing LLM-generated codes with human-generated codes from a peer-reviewed systematic review on assessment. Our findings suggested that the performance of LLMs fluctuates by data volume and question complexity for systematic reviews.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 1 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2025.
Builds on
0 of 1 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.