mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Can a Crow Hatch a Falcon? Lineage Matters in Predicting Large Language Model Performance

arXiv 2504.19811 ↗First posted 28 Apr 2025cs.CLcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Accurately forecasting the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) before extensive fine-tuning or merging can substantially reduce both computational expense and development time. Although prior approaches like scaling laws account for global factors such as parameter size or training tokens, they often overlook explicit lineage relationships-i.e., which models are derived or merged from which parents. In this work, we propose a novel Lineage-Regularized Matrix Factorization (LRMF) framework that encodes ancestral ties among LLMs via a graph Laplacian regularizer. By leveraging multi-hop parent-child connections, LRMF consistently outperforms conventional matrix factorization and collaborative filtering methods in both instance-level and benchmark-level performance prediction. Our large-scale study includes 2,934 publicly available Hugging Face models and 21,000+ instances across 6 major benchmarks, showing that the introduction of lineage constraints yields up to 0.15-0.30 higher Pearson correlation coefficients with actual performance compared to baseline methods. Moreover, LRMF effectively addresses the cold-start problem, providing accurate estimates for newly derived or merged models even with minimal data. This lineage-guided strategy thus offers a resource-efficient way to inform hyperparameter tuning, data selection, and model combination in modern LLM development.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 25 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2025.

Builds on

21 of 25 references.

References · 21

  1. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,586
  3. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,371
  4. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,879
  5. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,848
  6. 2022Challenging BIG-Bench Tasks and Whether Chain-of-Thought Can Solve Themcited by 1,807
  7. 2017Neural Collaborative Filteringcited by 1,111
  8. 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 682
  9. 2024tinyBenchmarks: evaluating LLMs with fewer examplescited by 310
  10. 2024RouterBench: A Benchmark for Multi-LLM Routing Systemcited by 238
  11. 2023MuSR: Testing the Limits of Chain-of-thought with Multistep Soft Reasoningcited by 201
  12. 2023Large Language Model Routing with Benchmark Datasetscited by 172
9 more
  1. 2022Scaling Laws and Interpretability of Learning from Repeated Datacited by 152
  2. 2023Routing to the Expert: Efficient Reward-guided Ensemble of Large Language Modelscited by 145
  3. 2024Observational Scaling Laws and the Predictability of Language Model Performancecited by 130
  4. 2024metabench -- A Sparse Benchmark of Reasoning and Knowledge in Large Language Modelscited by 39
  5. 2024How predictable is language model benchmark performance?cited by 37
  6. 2023How Predictable Are Large Language Model Capabilities? A Case Study on BIG-benchcited by 34
  7. 2024A Hitchhiker's Guide to Scaling Law Estimationcited by 27
  8. 2024100 instances is all you need: predicting the success of a new LLM on unseen data by testing on a few instancescited by 24
  9. 2024Collaborative Performance Prediction for Large Language Modelscited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.

1 paper.