Graph Fourier Transformer with Structure-Frequency Information
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Graph Transformers (GTs) have shown advantages in numerous graph structure tasks but their self-attention mechanism ignores the generalization bias of graphs, with existing methods mainly compensating for this bias from aspects like position encoding, attention bias and relative distance yet still having sub-optimal performance and being insufficient by only considering the structural perspective of generalization bias. To address this, this paper proposes Grafourierformer, which innovatively combines GT with inductive bias containing Frequency-Structure information by applying Graph Fourier Transform to the Attention Matrix: specifically, eigenvalues from the Graph Laplacian matrix are used to construct an Eigenvalue matrix mask (reflecting node positions and structural relationships with neighboring nodes to enable consideration of node range structural characteristics and focus on local graph details), and inverse Fourier transform is employed to extract node high-frequency and low-frequency features, calculate low-frequency and high-frequency energy, and construct a node frequency-energy matrix to filter the eigenvalue matrix mask, allowing attention heads to incorporate both graph structural information and node frequency information optimization, adaptively distinguish global trends from local details, and effectively suppress redundant information interference. Extensive experiments on various benchmarks show Grafourierformer consistently outperforms GNN and GT-based models in graph classification and node classification tasks, with ablation experiments further validating the effectiveness and necessity of the method. Codes are available at https://github.com/Arichibald/Grafourierformer.git
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Apr 2025.
Builds on
23 of 29 references.
References · 23
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2020Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on Graphscited by 2,163
- 2015Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networkscited by 796
- 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 728
- 2022Recipe for a General, Powerful, Scalable Graph Transformercited by 713
- 2020Benchmarking Graph Neural Networkscited by 680
- 2020A Generalization of Transformer Networks to Graphscited by 661
- 2023Retentive Network: A Successor to Transformer for Large Language Modelscited by 613
- 2021Rethinking Graph Transformers with Spectral Attentioncited by 473
- 2023NodeFormer: A Scalable Graph Structure Learning Transformer for Node Classificationcited by 210
11 more
- 2022Representing Long-Range Context for Graph Neural Networks with Global Attentioncited by 195
- 2022Structure-Aware Transformer for Graph Representation Learningcited by 194
- 2021Global Self-Attention as a Replacement for Graph Convolutioncited by 114
- 2023DIFFormer: Scalable (Graph) Transformers Induced by Energy Constrained Diffusioncited by 87
- 2021From block-Toeplitz matrices to differential equations on graphs: towards a general theory for scalable masked Transformerscited by 38
- 2020Self-Attention with Cross-Lingual Position Representationcited by 27
- 2021Learning Attributed Graph Representations with Communicative Message Passing Transformercited by 20
- 2023Are More Layers Beneficial to Graph Transformers?cited by 15
- 2024Gradformer: Graph Transformer with Exponential Decaycited by 11
- 2022Entity Alignment with Reliable Path Reasoning and Relation-Aware Heterogeneous Graph Transformercited by 7
- 2023Exploring Sparsity in Graph Transformerscited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.