mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Differentially Private Quasi-Concave Optimization: Bypassing the Lower Bound and Application to Geometric Problems

arXiv 2504.19001 ↗First posted 26 Apr 2025cs.CRcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We study the sample complexity of differentially private optimization of quasi-concave functions. For a fixed input domain X, Cohen et al. (STOC 2023) proved that any generic private optimizer for low sensitive quasi-concave functions must have sample complexity Omega(2log^*|X|). We show that the lower bound can be bypassed for a series of ``natural'' problems. We define a new class of approximated quasi-concave functions, and present a generic differentially private optimizer for approximated quasi-concave functions with sample complexity tildeO(log^*|X|). As applications, we use our optimizer to privately select a center point of points in d dimensions and probably approximately correct (PAC) learn d-dimensional halfspaces. In previous works, Bun et al. (FOCS 2015) proved a lower bound of Omega(log^*|X|) for both problems. Beimel et al. (COLT 2019) and Kaplan et al. (NeurIPS 2020) gave an upper bound of tildeO(d2.5· 2log^*|X|) for the two problems, respectively. We improve the dependency of the upper bounds on the cardinality of the domain by presenting a new upper bound of tildeO(d5.5·log^*|X|) for both problems. To the best of our understanding, this is the first work to reduce the sample complexity dependency on |X| for these two problems from exponential in log^* |X| to log^* |X|.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2025.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

3 papers.