Revisiting Transformers through the Lens of Low Entropy and Dynamic Sparsity
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Compression has been a critical lens to understand the success of Transformers. In the past, we have typically taken the target distribution as a criterion to evaluate a model's compression performance. Nevertheless,it often remains challenging to precisely assess how well the model achieves compression and to compare the information content of the learned distribution with that of the target distribution during compression,as the target distribution is typically unknown and entropy computation often incurs exponential cost. In this work, we explore these issues under a controlled experimental setup. We find that Transformers exhibit a unique inductive bias in data compression: beyond approaching the target distribution, they tend to favor learning lower-entropy distributions, with this tendency becoming more pronounced as the model size increases. This preference prevents Transformers from perfectly aligning with the target distribution, instead further compressing its information content. Furthermore, we show that the FFN module plays a critical role in driving this bias. In addition, while models remove informational redundancy from data during compression, they also exhibit redundancy within their parameters, which enables compression and can be characterized through dynamic sparsity. However, the dynamic sparsity patterns in Transformers, particularly in attention and FFN modules, demand further exploration. As for this, we show that larger Transformers show stronger preferences for bypassing attention computations via residual connections and have lower proportion of active neurons. Interestingly, we also find that training instability in larger models strongly correlates with sudden increases in dead neurons. Our work contributes to a deeper understanding of Transformers from the lens of entropy and dynamic sparsity.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 32 of its 44 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Apr 2025.
Builds on
32 of 44 references.
References · 32
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2022PaLM: Scaling Language Modeling with Pathwayscited by 5,326
- 2022OPT: Open Pre-trained Transformer Language Modelscited by 3,512
- 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
- 2014Empirical Evaluation of Gated Recurrent Neural Networks on Sequence Modelingcited by 2,367
- 2019Generating Long Sequences with Sparse Transformerscited by 1,546
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
- 2021Attention is Not All You Need: Pure Attention Loses Rank Doubly Exponentially with Depthcited by 419
- 2024Mixture-of-Depths: Dynamically allocating compute in transformer-based language modelscited by 258
- 2024A Survey on Mixture of Experts in Large Language Modelscited by 237
- 2019Depth-Adaptive Transformercited by 236
20 more
- 2023Language Modeling Is Compressioncited by 225
- 2021Efficient Large Scale Language Modeling with Mixtures of Expertscited by 175
- 2024Scaling Laws for Fine-Grained Mixture of Expertscited by 173
- 2019Sparse Sequence-to-Sequence Modelscited by 170
- 2019Adaptively Sparse Transformerscited by 155
- 2022Signal Propagation in Transformers: Theoretical Perspectives and the Role of Rank Collapsecited by 141
- 2024Transformers are Multi-State RNNscited by 120
- 2024Understanding Emergent Abilities of Language Models from the Loss Perspectivecited by 94
- 2023Neurons in Large Language Models: Dead, N-gram, Positionalcited by 88
- 2022Same Pre-training Loss, Better Downstream: Implicit Bias Matters for Language Modelscited by 84
- 2023White-Box Transformers via Sparse Rate Reductioncited by 80
- 2023A Theory on Adam Instability in Large-Scale Machine Learningcited by 56
- 2024Compression Represents Intelligence Linearlycited by 56
- 2023A Study on ReLU and Softmax in Transformercited by 53
- 2023Deep Transformers without Shortcuts: Modifying Self-attention for Faithful Signal Propagationcited by 45
- 2023Simplifying Transformer Blockscited by 37
- 2024Implicit Bias and Fast Convergence Rates for Self-attentioncited by 31
- 2024Implicit Regularization of Gradient Flow on One-Layer Softmax Attentioncited by 19
- 2025Understanding LLM Behaviors via Compression: Data Generation, Knowledge Acquisition and Scaling Lawscited by 15
- 2024Scaling White-Box Transformers for Visioncited by 9
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.