mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Residual-Evasive Attacks on ADMM in Distributed Optimization

arXiv 2504.18570 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2025cs.CR cs.DC cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This paper presents two attack strategies designed to evade detection in ADMM-based systems by preventing significant changes to the residual during the attacked iteration. While many detection algorithms focus on identifying false data injection through residual changes, we show that our attacks remain undetected by keeping the residual largely unchanged. The first strategy uses a random starting point combined with Gram-Schmidt orthogonalization to ensure stealth, with potential for refinement by enhancing the orthogonal component to increase system disruption. The second strategy builds on the first, targeting financial gains by manipulating reactive power and pushing the system to its upper voltage limit, exploiting operational constraints. The effectiveness of the proposed attack-resilient mechanism is demonstrated through case studies on the IEEE 14-bus system. A comparison of the two strategies, along with commonly used naive attacks, reveals trade-offs between simplicity, detectability, and effectiveness, providing insights into ADMM system vulnerabilities. These findings underscore the need for more robust monitoring algorithms to protect against advanced attack strategies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.

Builds on

3 of 16 references.

References · 3

  1. 2022Detection of False Data Injection Attacks in Smart Grid: A Secure Federated Deep Learning Approachcited by 27
  2. 2023Machine Learning to detect cyber-attacks and discriminating the types of power system disturbancescited by 2
  3. 2023On the Detection of Shared Data Manipulation in Distributed Optimizationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.