mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

DualBreach: Efficient Dual-Jailbreaking via Target-Driven Initialization and Multi-Target Optimization

arXiv 2504.18564 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2025cs.CR cs.AIcited by 9

On the map: LLM safety and security → Jailbreaking

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent research has focused on exploring the vulnerabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs), aiming to elicit harmful and/or sensitive content from LLMs. However, due to the insufficient research on dual-jailbreaking -- attacks targeting both LLMs and Guardrails, the effectiveness of existing attacks is limited when attempting to bypass safety-aligned LLMs shielded by guardrails. Therefore, in this paper, we propose DualBreach, a target-driven framework for dual-jailbreaking. DualBreach employs a Target-driven Initialization (TDI) strategy to dynamically construct initial prompts, combined with a Multi-Target Optimization (MTO) method that utilizes approximate gradients to jointly adapt the prompts across guardrails and LLMs, which can simultaneously save the number of queries and achieve a high dual-jailbreaking success rate. For black-box guardrails, DualBreach either employs a powerful open-sourced guardrail or imitates the target black-box guardrail by training a proxy model, to incorporate guardrails into the MTO process. We demonstrate the effectiveness of DualBreach in dual-jailbreaking scenarios through extensive evaluation on several widely-used datasets. Experimental results indicate that DualBreach outperforms state-of-the-art methods with fewer queries, achieving significantly higher success rates across all settings. More specifically, DualBreach achieves an average dual-jailbreaking success rate of 93.67% against GPT-4 with Llama-Guard-3 protection, whereas the best success rate achieved by other methods is 88.33%. Moreover, DualBreach only uses an average of 1.77 queries per successful dual-jailbreak, outperforming other state-of-the-art methods. For the purpose of defense, we propose an XGBoost-based ensemble defensive mechanism named EGuard, which integrates the strengths of multiple guardrails, demonstrating superior performance compared with Llama-Guard-3.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Jailbreaking, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 31 of its 45 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2025.

Builds on

31 of 45 references.

Closest ancestors · 12

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Jailbreaking Large Language Models Against Moderation Guardrails via Cipher Characters30 May
  2. 2024PRP: Propagating Universal Perturbations to Attack Large Language Model Guard-Rails24 Feb
  3. 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreaks15 Feb
  4. 2024COLD-Attack: Jailbreaking LLMs with Stealthiness and Controllability13 Feb
  5. 2024How Johnny Can Persuade LLMs to Jailbreak Them: Rethinking Persuasion to Challenge AI Safety by Humanizing LLMs12 Jan
  6. 2023Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks Through Goal Prioritization15 Nov
  7. 2023A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easily14 Nov
  8. 2023SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attacks5 Oct
  9. 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models3 Oct
  10. 2023Detecting Language Model Attacks with Perplexity27 Aug
  11. 2023"Do Anything Now": Characterizing and Evaluating In-The-Wild Jailbreak Prompts on Large Language Models7 Aug
  12. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Models27 Jul

Other references · 19

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,132
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,192
  3. 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,175
  4. 2017TriviaQA: A Large Scale Distantly Supervised Challenge Dataset for Reading Comprehensioncited by 2,895
  5. 2023A Survey of Large Language Modelscited by 2,537
  6. 2018Can a Suit of Armor Conduct Electricity? A New Dataset for Open Book Question Answeringcited by 2,114
  7. 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,076
  8. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  9. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,106
  10. 2017Efficient Processing of Deep Neural Networks: A Tutorial and Surveycited by 427
  11. 2023Understanding the Effects of RLHF on LLM Generalisation and Diversitycited by 386
  12. 2023NeMo Guardrails: A Toolkit for Controllable and Safe LLM Applications with Programmable Railscited by 347
7 more
  1. 2024Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakerscited by 302
  2. 2024PKU-SafeRLHF: Towards Multi-Level Safety Alignment for LLMs with Human Preferencecited by 252
  3. 2022COLD Decoding: Energy-based Constrained Text Generation with Langevin Dynamicscited by 159
  4. 2016Yelp Dataset Challenge: Review Rating Predictioncited by 84
  5. 2024PAL: Proxy-Guided Black-Box Attack on Large Language Modelscited by 46
  6. 2024Current state of LLM Risks and AI Guardrailscited by 44
  7. 2023Learn to Refuse: Making Large Language Models More Controllable and Reliable through Knowledge Scope Limitation and Refusal Mechanismcited by 33

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2025: 4; 2026: 5.

9 papers.