mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Enhancing Visual Interpretability and Explainability in Functional Survival Trees and Forests

arXiv 2504.18498 ↗First posted 25 Apr 2025stat.ML cs.LG stat.MEcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Functional survival models are key tools for analyzing time-to-event data with complex predictors, such as functional or high-dimensional inputs. Despite their predictive strength, these models often lack interpretability, which limits their value in practical decision-making and risk analysis. This study investigates two key survival models: the Functional Survival Tree (FST) and the Functional Random Survival Forest (FRSF). It introduces novel methods and tools to enhance the interpretability of FST models and improve the explainability of FRSF ensembles. Using both real and simulated datasets, the results demonstrate that the proposed approaches yield efficient, easy-to-understand decision trees that accurately capture the underlying decision-making processes of the model ensemble.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 21 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Apr 2025.

Builds on

8 of 21 references.

References · 8

  1. 2014Interpreting Tree Ensembles with inTreescited by 37
  2. 2022SurvSHAP(t): Time-dependent explanations of machine learning survival modelscited by 24
  3. 2024Supervised Learning via Ensembles of Diverse Functional Representations: the Functional Voting Classifiercited by 5
  4. 2020Ensemble methods for survival function estimation with time-varying covariatescited by 4
  5. 2022Random survival forests with multivariate longitudinal endogenous covariatescited by 4
  6. 2020Clustering multivariate functional data using unsupervised binary treescited by 3
  7. 2024Random Survival Forest for Censored Functional Datacited by 3
  8. 2020Measure Inducing Classification and Regression Trees for Functional Datacited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.