mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Approaches to Responsible Governance of GenAI in Organizations

arXiv 2504.17044 ↗First posted 23 Apr 2025cs.CY cs.AI cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

PEER-REVIEWED AND ACCEPTED IN IEEE- ISTAS 2025 The rapid evolution of Generative AI (GenAI) has introduced unprecedented opportunities while presenting complex challenges around ethics, accountability, and societal impact. This paper draws on a literature review, established governance frameworks, and industry roundtable discussions to identify core principles for integrating responsible GenAI governance into diverse organizational structures. Our objective is to provide actionable recommendations for a balanced, risk-based governance approach that enables both innovation and oversight. Findings emphasize the need for adaptable risk assessment tools, continuous monitoring practices, and cross-sector collaboration to establish trustworthy GenAI. These insights provide a structured foundation and Responsible GenAI Guide (ResAI) for organizations to align GenAI initiatives with ethical, legal, and operational best practices.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 2 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Apr 2025.

Builds on

2 of 17 references.

References · 2

  1. 2023Responsible AI Governance: A Systematic Literature Reviewcited by 4
  2. 2025Ethical Concerns of Generative AI and Mitigation Strategies: A Systematic Mapping Studycited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.