mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MetaHarm: Harmful YouTube Video Dataset Annotated by Domain Experts, GPT-4-Turbo, and Crowdworkers

arXiv 2504.16304 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2025cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Short video platforms, such as YouTube, Instagram, or TikTok, are used by billions of users. These platforms expose users to harmful content, ranging from clickbait or physical harms to hate or misinformation. Yet, we lack a comprehensive understanding and measurement of online harm on short video platforms. Toward this end, we present two large-scale datasets of multi-modal and multi-categorical online harm: (1) 60,906 systematically selected potentially harmful YouTube videos and (2) 19,422 videos annotated by three labeling actors: trained domain experts, GPT-4-Turbo (using 14 image frames, 1 thumbnail, and text metadata), and crowdworkers (Amazon Mechanical Turk master workers). The annotated dataset includes both (a) binary classification (harmful vs. harmless) and (b) multi-label categorizations of six harm categories: Information, Hate and harassment, Addictive, Clickbait, Sexual, and Physical harms. Furthermore, the annotated dataset provides (1) ground truth data with videos annotated consistently across (a) all three actors and (b) the majority of the labeling actors, and (2) three data subsets labeled by individual actors. These datasets are expected to facilitate future work on online harm, aid in (multi-modal) classification efforts, and advance the identification and potential mitigation of harmful content on video platforms.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 63 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.

Builds on

12 of 63 references.

References · 12

  1. 2022The 'Problem' of Human Label Variation: On Ground Truth in Data, Modeling and Evaluationcited by 139
  2. 2022Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm Reductioncited by 138
  3. 2019Auditing Radicalization Pathways on YouTubecited by 53
  4. 2021A Framework of Severity for Harmful Content Onlinecited by 23
  5. 2024Prompt Stability Scoring for Text Annotation with Large Language Modelscited by 15
  6. 2019Algorithmic Extremism: Examining YouTube's Rabbit Hole of Radicalizationcited by 13
  7. 2023YouNICon: YouTube's CommuNIty of Conspiracy Videoscited by 13
  8. 2024Harmful YouTube Video Detection: A Taxonomy of Online Harm and MLLMs as Alternative Annotatorscited by 8
  9. 2021Are Anti-Feminist Communities Gateways to the Far Right? Evidence from Reddit and YouTubecited by 6
  10. 2024Accuracy of a Large Language Model in Distinguishing Anti- And Pro-vaccination Messages on Social Media: The Case of Human Papillomavirus Vaccinationcited by 5
  11. 2024AI on AI: Exploring the Utility of GPT as an Expert Annotator of AI Publicationscited by 4
  12. 2021A First Look at Scams on YouTubecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2021Detecting Harmful Content On Online Platforms: What Platforms Need Vs. Where Research Efforts Go
  2. 2026Auditing Exposure to Harmful Content on TikTok using Multimodal Language Models: A Cross-National, Age-Stratified Study
  3. 2023How We Define Harm Impacts Data Annotations: Explaining How Annotators Distinguish Hateful, Offensive, and Toxic Comments
  4. 2025Towards Safer Pretraining: Analyzing and Filtering Harmful Content in Webscale datasets for Responsible LLMs
  5. 2025Understanding and Mitigating Toxicity in Image-Text Pretraining Datasets: A Case Study on LLaVA
  6. 2026When Youth Enter the Algorithmic Wild: Discovering and Understanding Potentially Harmful Teen Videos on Douyin and Kwai
  7. 2025Towards Safer Social Media Platforms: Scalable and Performant Few-Shot Harmful Content Moderation Using Large Language Models
  8. 2022Detecting and Understanding Harmful Memes: A Survey