Deep Learning Meets Process-Based Models: A Hybrid Approach to Agricultural Challenges
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Process-based models (PBMs) and deep learning (DL) are two key approaches in agricultural modelling, each offering distinct advantages and limitations. PBMs provide mechanistic insights based on physical and biological principles, ensuring interpretability and scientific rigour. However, they often struggle with scalability, parameterisation, and adaptation to heterogeneous environments. In contrast, DL models excel at capturing complex, nonlinear patterns from large datasets but may suffer from limited interpretability, high computational demands, and overfitting in data-scarce scenarios. This study presents a systematic review of PBMs, DL models, and hybrid PBM-DL frameworks, highlighting their applications in agricultural and environmental modelling. We classify hybrid PBM-DL approaches into DL-informed PBMs, where neural networks refine process-based models, and PBM-informed DL, where physical constraints guide deep learning predictions. Additionally, we conduct a case study on crop dry biomass prediction, comparing hybrid models against standalone PBMs and DL models under varying data quality, sample sizes, and spatial conditions. The results demonstrate that hybrid models consistently outperform traditional PBMs and DL models, offering greater robustness to noisy data and improved generalisation across unseen locations. Finally, we discuss key challenges, including model interpretability, scalability, and data requirements, alongside actionable recommendations for advancing hybrid modelling in agriculture. By integrating domain knowledge with AI-driven approaches, this study contributes to the development of scalable, interpretable, and reproducible agricultural models that support data-driven decision-making for sustainable agriculture.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 148 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.
Builds on
20 of 148 references.
References · 20
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
- 2017Physics Informed Deep Learning (Part I): Data-driven Solutions of Nonlinear Partial Differential Equationscited by 373
- 2021Finite Basis Physics-Informed Neural Networks (FBPINNs): a scalable domain decomposition approach for solving differential equationscited by 145
- 2019A Differentiable Programming System to Bridge Machine Learning and Scientific Computingcited by 83
- 2021The physics of higher-order interactions in complex systemscited by 63
- 2021Physics-informed Convolutional Neural Networks for Temperature Field Prediction of Heat Source Layout without Labeled Datacited by 31
- 2020From calibration to parameter learning: Harnessing the scaling effects of big data in geoscientific modelingcited by 26
- 2021Physics-informed neural network simulation of multiphase poroelasticity using stress-split sequential trainingcited by 26
- 2022Optimizing Nitrogen Management with Deep Reinforcement Learning and Crop Simulationscited by 20
- 2020Coupling Machine Learning and Crop Modeling Improves Crop Yield Prediction in the US Corn Beltcited by 17
- 2020Simultaneous Corn and Soybean Yield Prediction from Remote Sensing Data Using Deep Transfer Learningcited by 16
8 more
- 2021A Latent Encoder Coupled Generative Adversarial Network (LE-GAN) for Efficient Hyperspectral Image Super-resolutioncited by 14
- 2021Corn Yield Prediction with Ensemble CNN-DNNcited by 12
- 2020Estimating Crop Primary Productivity with Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8 using Machine Learning Methods Trained with Radiative Transfer Simulationscited by 7
- 2022BP-Triplet Net for Unsupervised Domain Adaptation: A Bayesian Perspectivecited by 7
- 2022Learning safety in model-based Reinforcement Learning using MPC and Gaussian Processescited by 4
- 2022Forward- or Reverse-Mode Automatic Differentiation: What's the Difference?cited by 4
- 2023ARTEMIS: Using GANs with Multiple Discriminators to Generate Artcited by 1
- 2024A Channel Attention-Driven Hybrid CNN Framework for Paddy Leaf Disease Detectioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.