mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Efficacy of a Computer Tutor that Models Expert Human Tutors

arXiv 2504.16132 ↗First posted 21 Apr 2025cs.CY cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Tutoring is highly effective for promoting learning. However, the contribution of expertise to tutoring effectiveness is unclear and continues to be debated. We conducted a 9-week learning efficacy study of an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) for biology modeled on expert human tutors with two control conditions: human tutors who were experts in the domain but not in tutoring and a no-tutoring condition. All conditions were supplemental to classroom instruction, and students took learning tests immediately before and after tutoring sessions as well as delayed tests 1-2 weeks later. Analysis using logistic mixed-effects modeling indicates significant positive effects on the immediate post-test for the ITS (d =.71) and human tutors (d =.66) which are in the 99th percentile of meta-analytic effects, as well as significant positive effects on the delayed post-test for the ITS (d =.36) and human tutors (d =.39). We discuss implications for the role of expertise in tutoring and the design of future studies.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 0 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Apr 2025.

Builds on

0 of 34 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.