Certified Mitigation of Worst-Case LLM Copyright Infringement
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The exposure of large language models (LLMs) to copyrighted material during pre-training raises concerns about unintentional copyright infringement post deployment. This has driven the development of "copyright takedown" methods, post-training approaches aimed at preventing models from generating content substantially similar to copyrighted ones. While current mitigation approaches are somewhat effective for average-case risks, we demonstrate that they overlook worst-case copyright risks exhibits by the existence of long, verbatim quotes from copyrighted sources. We propose BloomScrub, a remarkably simple yet highly effective inference-time approach that provides certified copyright takedown. Our method repeatedly interleaves quote detection with rewriting techniques to transform potentially infringing segments. By leveraging efficient data sketches (Bloom filters), our approach enables scalable copyright screening even for large-scale real-world corpora. When quotes beyond a length threshold cannot be removed, the system can abstain from responding, offering certified risk reduction. Experimental results show that BloomScrub reduces infringement risk, preserves utility, and accommodates different levels of enforcement stringency with adaptive abstention. Our results suggest that lightweight, inference-time methods can be surprisingly effective for copyright prevention.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.
Builds on
17 of 38 references.
References · 17
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2024LlamaFactory: Unified Efficient Fine-Tuning of 100+ Language Modelscited by 1,464
- 2021Deduplicating Training Data Makes Language Models Bettercited by 714
- 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMscited by 533
- 2023Who's Harry Potter? Approximate Unlearning in LLMscited by 381
- 2016NewsQA: A Machine Comprehension Datasetcited by 331
- 2024Infini-gram: Scaling Unbounded n-gram Language Models to a Trillion Tokenscited by 153
- 2019Comparison of Diverse Decoding Methods from Conditional Language Modelscited by 78
- 2024Be like a Goldfish, Don't Memorize! Mitigating Memorization in Generative LLMscited by 50
- 2021Addressing "Documentation Debt" in Machine Learning Research: A Retrospective Datasheet for BookCorpuscited by 47
5 more
- 2024Evaluating Copyright Takedown Methods for Language Modelscited by 43
- 2024CopyBench: Measuring Literal and Non-Literal Reproduction of Copyright-Protected Text in Language Model Generationcited by 35
- 2024SHIELD: Evaluation and Defense Strategies for Copyright Compliance in LLM Text Generationcited by 34
- 2023Data Portraits: Recording Foundation Model Training Datacited by 30
- 2024Avoiding Copyright Infringement via Large Language Model Unlearningcited by 24
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.