Benchmarking machine learning models for predicting aerofoil performance
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper investigates the capability of Neural Networks (NNs) as alternatives to the traditional methods to analyse the performance of aerofoils used in the wind and tidal energy industry. The current methods used to assess the characteristic lift and drag coefficients include Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD), thin aerofoil and panel methods, all face trade-offs between computational speed and the accuracy of the results and as such NNs have been investigated as an alternative with the aim that it would perform both quickly and accurately. As such, this paper provides a benchmark for the windAIbench dataset published by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) in the USA. In order to validate the methodology of the benchmarking, the AirfRANSdataset benchmark is used as both a starting point and a point of comparison. This study evaluates four neural networks (MLP, PointNet, GraphSAGE, GUNet) trained on a range of aerofoils at 25 angles of attack (4^circ to 20^circ) to predict fluid flow and calculate lift coefficients (CL) via the panel method. GraphSAGE and GUNet performed well during the training phase, but underperformed during testing. Accordingly, this paper has identified PointNet and MLP as the two strongest models tested, however whilst the results from MLP are more commonly correct for predicting the behaviour of the fluid, the results from PointNet provide the more accurate results for calculating CL.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.
Builds on
12 of 33 references.
References · 12
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2016PointNet: Deep Learning on Point Sets for 3D Classification and Segmentationcited by 5,248
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2019Fast Graph Representation Learning with PyTorch Geometriccited by 2,434
- 2019Graph U-Netscited by 492
- 2022AirfRANS: High Fidelity Computational Fluid Dynamics Dataset for Approximating Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes Solutionscited by 82
- 2023CFDBench: A Large-Scale Benchmark for Machine Learning Methods in Fluid Dynamicscited by 46
- 2020Graph Convolutional Neural Networks for Body Force Predictioncited by 16
- 2022End-to-end Wind Turbine Wake Modelling with Deep Graph Representation Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.