mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CARE: Compatibility-Aware Incentive Mechanisms for Federated Learning with Budgeted Requesters

arXiv 2504.15847 ↗First posted 22 Apr 2025cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning (FL) is a promising approach that allows requesters (eg, servers) to obtain local training models from workers (e.g., clients). Since workers are typically unwilling to provide training services/models freely and voluntarily, many incentive mechanisms in FL are designed to incentivize participation by offering monetary rewards from requesters. However, existing studies neglect two crucial aspects of real-world FL scenarios. First, workers can possess inherent incompatibility characteristics (e.g., communication channels and data sources), which can lead to degradation of FL efficiency (e.g., low communication efficiency and poor model generalization). Second, the requesters are budgeted, which limits the amount of workers they can hire for their tasks. In this paper, we investigate the scenario in FL where multiple budgeted requesters seek training services from incompatible workers with private training costs. We consider two settings: the cooperative budget setting where requesters cooperate to pool their budgets to improve their overall utility and the non-cooperative budget setting where each requester optimizes their utility within their own budgets. To address efficiency degradation caused by worker incompatibility, we develop novel compatibility-aware incentive mechanisms, CARE-CO and CARE-NO, for both settings to elicit true private costs and determine workers to hire for requesters and their rewards while satisfying requester budget constraints. Our mechanisms guarantee individual rationality, truthfulness, budget feasibility, and approximation performance. We conduct extensive experiments using real-world datasets to show that the proposed mechanisms significantly outperform existing baselines.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 41 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Apr 2025.

Builds on

17 of 41 references.

References · 17

  1. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,046
  2. 2021Model-Contrastive Federated Learningcited by 766
  3. 2018Adaptive Federated Learning in Resource Constrained Edge Computing Systemscited by 409
  4. 2019Federated Learning over Wireless Fading Channelscited by 183
  5. 2017Learning from Noisy Labels with Distillationcited by 161
  6. 2021Federated Learning for Open Bankingcited by 141
  7. 2023Federated Learning for Generalization, Robustness, Fairness: A Survey and Benchmarkcited by 99
  8. 2019Reliable Federated Learning for Mobile Networkscited by 92
  9. 2020FMore: An Incentive Scheme of Multi-dimensional Auction for Federated Learning in MECcited by 48
  10. 2021Incentive Mechanisms for Federated Learning: From Economic and Game Theoretic Perspectivecited by 47
  11. 2020An Incentive Mechanism for Federated Learning in Wireless Cellular network: An Auction Approachcited by 39
  12. 2019Toward an Automated Auction Framework for Wireless Federated Learning Services Marketcited by 38
5 more
  1. 2021Bandwidth Allocation for Multiple Federated Learning Services in Wireless Edge Networkscited by 10
  2. 2021FL-Market: Trading Private Models in Federated Learningcited by 9
  3. 2022Online Auction-Based Incentive Mechanism Design for Horizontal Federated Learning with Budget Constraintcited by 6
  4. 2017On Budget-Feasible Mechanism Design for Symmetric Submodular Objectivescited by 2
  5. 2019Optimal Budget-Feasible Mechanisms for Additive Valuationscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.