Optimal Scheduling of Dynamic Transport
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Flow-based methods for sampling and generative modeling use continuous-time dynamical systems to represent a transport map that pushes forward a source measure to a target measure. The introduction of a time axis provides considerable design freedom, and a central question is how to exploit this freedom. Though many popular methods seek straight line (i.e., zero acceleration) trajectories, we show here that a specific class of ``curved'' trajectories can significantly improve approximation and learning. In particular, we consider the unit-time interpolation of any given transport map T and seek the schedule τ: [0,1] → [0,1] that minimizes the spatial Lipschitz constant of the corresponding velocity field over all times t ∈ [0,1]. This quantity is crucial as it allows for control of the approximation error when the velocity field is learned from data. We show that, for a broad class of source/target measures and transport maps T, the optimal schedule can be computed in closed form, and that the resulting optimal Lipschitz constant is exponentially smaller than that induced by an identity schedule (corresponding to, for instance, the Wasserstein geodesic). Our proof technique relies on the calculus of variations and Gamma-convergence, allowing us to approximate the aforementioned degenerate objective by a family of smooth, tractable problems.
Key facts. Cited by 13 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2025.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 5; 2026: 8.
13 papers.
Sort:
By area:
- 2025Lipschitz-Guided Design of Interpolation Schedules in Generative Modelscited by 17
- 2025Distribution estimation via Flow Matching with Lipschitz guaranteescited by 6
- 2026Is Flow Matching Just Trajectory Replay for Sequential Data?cited by 3
- 2026Self-Consistent Flow: Unifying Velocity and Endpoint Prediction for Rectified Flow Modelscited by 3
- 2026Sharpen Your Flow: Sharpness-Aware Sampling for Flow Matchingcited by 2
- 2025Learning Paths for Dynamic Measure Transport: A Control Perspectivecited by 1
- 2025Adaptive Path Integral Diffusion: AdaPIDcited by 1
- 2026Entropy Across the Bridge: Conditional-Marginal Discretization for Flow and Schr"odinger Samplerscited by 1
- 2026Gaussian Flow-Matching Schedules: Implications for Sampling and Trainingcited by 1
- 2025Time-dependent density estimation using binary classifierscited by 0
- 2026Population-Level Generative Modeling for Ranking Datacited by 0
- 2026Model-Aware Schedules Improve Generation via Fiberwise Optimal Transportcited by 0
1 more
- 2026Geometry-Aware Time Reparameterization for Flow-Map Distillation1 Oct 2026
- 2026Gaussian Flow-Matching Schedules: Implications for Sampling and Training22 Sep 2026
- 2026Model-Aware Schedules Improve Generation via Fiberwise Optimal Transport10 Sep 2026
- 2026Population-Level Generative Modeling for Ranking Data9 Aug 2026
- 2026Self-Consistent Flow: Unifying Velocity and Endpoint Prediction for Rectified Flow Models13 Jul 2026
- 2026Entropy Across the Bridge: Conditional-Marginal Discretization for Flow and Schr"odinger Samplers15 May 2026
- 2026Sharpen Your Flow: Sharpness-Aware Sampling for Flow Matching12 May 2026
- 2026Is Flow Matching Just Trajectory Replay for Sequential Data?9 Feb 2026
- 2025Adaptive Path Integral Diffusion: AdaPID5 Dec 2025
- 2025Learning Paths for Dynamic Measure Transport: A Control Perspective5 Nov 2025
- 2025Distribution estimation via Flow Matching with Lipschitz guarantees2 Sep 2025
- 2025Lipschitz-Guided Design of Interpolation Schedules in Generative Models1 Sep 2025
1 more
- 2025Time-dependent density estimation using binary classifiers18 Jun 2025
- 2025Lipschitz-Guided Design of Interpolation Schedules in Generative Modelscited by 17
- 2025Distribution estimation via Flow Matching with Lipschitz guaranteescited by 6
- 2026Is Flow Matching Just Trajectory Replay for Sequential Data?cited by 3
- 2026Self-Consistent Flow: Unifying Velocity and Endpoint Prediction for Rectified Flow Modelscited by 3
- 2026Sharpen Your Flow: Sharpness-Aware Sampling for Flow Matchingcited by 2
- 2026Gaussian Flow-Matching Schedules: Implications for Sampling and Trainingcited by 1
- 2026Model-Aware Schedules Improve Generation via Fiberwise Optimal Transportcited by 0
- 2026Gaussian Flow-Matching Schedules: Implications for Sampling and Training22 Sep 2026
- 2026Model-Aware Schedules Improve Generation via Fiberwise Optimal Transport10 Sep 2026
- 2026Self-Consistent Flow: Unifying Velocity and Endpoint Prediction for Rectified Flow Models13 Jul 2026
- 2026Sharpen Your Flow: Sharpness-Aware Sampling for Flow Matching12 May 2026
- 2026Is Flow Matching Just Trajectory Replay for Sequential Data?9 Feb 2026
- 2025Distribution estimation via Flow Matching with Lipschitz guarantees2 Sep 2025
- 2025Lipschitz-Guided Design of Interpolation Schedules in Generative Models1 Sep 2025
- 2025Learning Paths for Dynamic Measure Transport: A Control Perspectivecited by 1
- 2025Adaptive Path Integral Diffusion: AdaPIDcited by 1
- 2026Entropy Across the Bridge: Conditional-Marginal Discretization for Flow and Schr"odinger Samplerscited by 1
- 2025Time-dependent density estimation using binary classifierscited by 0
- 2026Population-Level Generative Modeling for Ranking Datacited by 0
- 2026Geometry-Aware Time Reparameterization for Flow-Map Distillationcited by 0
- 2026Geometry-Aware Time Reparameterization for Flow-Map Distillation1 Oct 2026
- 2026Population-Level Generative Modeling for Ranking Data9 Aug 2026
- 2026Entropy Across the Bridge: Conditional-Marginal Discretization for Flow and Schr"odinger Samplers15 May 2026
- 2025Adaptive Path Integral Diffusion: AdaPID5 Dec 2025
- 2025Learning Paths for Dynamic Measure Transport: A Control Perspective5 Nov 2025
- 2025Time-dependent density estimation using binary classifiers18 Jun 2025