Rethinking Client-oriented Federated Graph Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
As a new distributed graph learning paradigm, Federated Graph Learning (FGL) facilitates collaborative model training across local systems while preserving data privacy. We review existing FGL approaches and categorize their optimization mechanisms into: (1) Server-Client (S-C), where clients upload local model parameters for server-side aggregation and global updates; (2) Client-Client (C-C), which allows direct exchange of information between clients and customizing their local training process. We reveal that C-C shows superior potential due to its refined communication structure. However, existing C-C methods broadcast redundant node representations, incurring high communication costs and privacy risks at the node level. To this end, we propose FedC4, which combines graph Condensation with C-C Collaboration optimization. Specifically, FedC4 employs graph condensation technique to refine the knowledge of each client's graph into a few synthetic embeddings instead of transmitting node-level knowledge. Moreover, FedC4 introduces three novel modules that allow the source client to send distinct node representations tailored to the target client's graph properties. Experiments on eight public real-world datasets show that FedC4 outperforms state-of-the-art baselines in both task performance and communication cost. Our code is now available on https://github.com/Ereshkigal1/FedC4.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Apr 2025.
Builds on
23 of 33 references.
References · 23
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,576
- 2013Spectral Networks and Locally Connected Networks on Graphscited by 1,102
- 2018Pitfalls of Graph Neural Network Evaluationcited by 1,007
- 2016Revisiting Semi-Supervised Learning with Graph Embeddingscited by 976
- 2020Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 494
- 2022FedDC: Federated Learning with Non-IID Data via Local Drift Decoupling and Correctioncited by 181
- 2021Graph Condensation for Graph Neural Networkscited by 150
11 more
- 2020A Survey of Privacy Attacks in Machine Learningcited by 146
- 2021Subgraph Federated Learning with Missing Neighbor Generationcited by 132
- 2022Privacy for Free: How does Dataset Condensation Help Privacy?cited by 120
- 2021Federated Graph Classification over Non-IID Graphscited by 114
- 2023Structure-free Graph Condensation: From Large-scale Graphs to Condensed Graph-free Datacited by 71
- 2021A Survey of Machine Learning for Computer Architecture and Systemscited by 53
- 2023Does Graph Distillation See Like Vision Dataset Counterpart?cited by 45
- 2024FedGTA: Topology-aware Averaging for Federated Graph Learningcited by 44
- 2024Federated Graph Semantic and Structural Learningcited by 30
- 2024Deep Efficient Private Neighbor Generation for Subgraph Federated Learningcited by 14
- 2024Federated Graph Condensation with Information Bottleneck Principlescited by 8
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.
2 papers.