Evaluation and Incident Prevention in an Enterprise AI Assistant
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Enterprise AI Assistants are increasingly deployed in domains where accuracy is paramount, making each erroneous output a potentially significant incident. This paper presents a comprehensive framework for monitoring, benchmarking, and continuously improving such complex, multi-component systems under active development by multiple teams. Our approach encompasses three key elements: (1) a hierarchical ``severity'' framework for incident detection that identifies and categorizes errors while attributing component-specific error rates, facilitating targeted improvements; (2) a scalable and principled methodology for benchmark construction, evaluation, and deployment, designed to accommodate multiple development teams, mitigate overfitting risks, and assess the downstream impact of system modifications; and (3) a continual improvement strategy leveraging multidimensional evaluation, enabling the identification and implementation of diverse enhancement opportunities. By adopting this holistic framework, organizations can systematically enhance the reliability and performance of their AI Assistants, ensuring their efficacy in critical enterprise environments. We conclude by discussing how this multifaceted evaluation approach opens avenues for various classes of enhancements, paving the way for more robust and trustworthy AI systems.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Apr 2025.
Builds on
14 of 29 references.
References · 14
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2024LLM2Vec: Large Language Models Are Secretly Powerful Text Encoderscited by 404
- 2023Don't Make Your LLM an Evaluation Benchmark Cheatercited by 194
- 2020Preventing Repeated Real World AI Failures by Cataloging Incidents: The AI Incident Databasecited by 96
- 2018Bayesian Coreset Construction via Greedy Iterative Geodesic Ascentcited by 68
- 2024A Survey on Large Language Model Hallucination via a Creativity Perspectivecited by 38
- 2020The Role of Domain Expertise in User Trust and the Impact of First Impressions with Intelligent Systemscited by 34
- 2019Discrepancy, Coresets, and Sketches in Machine Learningcited by 30
- 2022Trust in AI and Its Role in the Acceptance of AI Technologiescited by 29
- 2021Assessing the Impact of Automated Suggestions on Decision Making: Domain Experts Mediate Model Errors but Take Less Initiativecited by 28
- 2024Evaluation and Continual Improvement for an Enterprise AI Assistantcited by 7
Built on by
Not cited yet.