GRAIL: Gradient-Based Adaptive Unlearning for Privacy and Copyright in LLMs
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on extensive datasets often learn sensitive information, which raises significant social and legal concerns under principles such as the "Right to be forgotten." Retraining entire models from scratch to remove undesired information is both costly and impractical. Furthermore, existing single-domain unlearning methods fail to address multi-domain scenarios, where knowledge is interwoven across domains such as privacy and copyright, creating overlapping representations that lead to excessive knowledge removal or degraded performance. To tackle these issues, we propose GRAIL (GRadient-based AdaptIve unLearning), a novel multi-domain unlearning framework. GRAIL leverages gradient information from multiple domains to precisely distinguish the unlearning scope from the retention scope, and applies an adaptive parameter-wise localization strategy to selectively remove targeted knowledge while preserving critical parameters for each domain. Experimental results on unlearning benchmarks show that GRAIL achieves unlearning success on par with the existing approaches, while also demonstrating up to 17% stronger knowledge retention success compared to the previous state-of-art method. Our findings establish a new paradigm for effectively managing and regulating sensitive information in large-scale pre-trained language models.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 21 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Apr 2025.
Builds on
21 of 31 references.
Closest ancestors · 11
Same direction, newest first
- 2024A Closer Look at Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models10 Oct
- 2024To Forget or Not? Towards Practical Knowledge Unlearning for Large Language Models2 Jul
- 2024Avoiding Copyright Infringement via Large Language Model Unlearning16 Jun
- 2024Negative Preference Optimization: From Catastrophic Collapse to Effective Unlearning8 Apr
- 2024Machine Unlearning of Pre-trained Large Language Models23 Feb
- 2024Towards Safer Large Language Models through Machine Unlearning15 Feb
- 2024Machine Unlearning in Large Language Models3 Feb
- 2024TOFU: A Task of Fictitious Unlearning for LLMs11 Jan
- 2023Unlearn What You Want to Forget: Efficient Unlearning for LLMs31 Oct
- 2023Large Language Model Unlearning14 Oct
- 2022Knowledge Unlearning for Mitigating Privacy Risks in Language Models4 Oct
Other references · 10
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2024Qwen2 Technical Reportcited by 2,120
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2022Mass-Editing Memory in a Transformercited by 1,001
- 2019Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Net: Selective Forgetting in Deep Networkscited by 618
- 2024Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 525
- 2021Fast Model Editing at Scalecited by 498
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 2.
3 papers.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025GRU: Mitigating the Trade-off between Unlearning and Retention for LLMs
- 2025Hierarchical Federated Unlearning for Large Language Models
- 2026Unlearning in LLMs: Methods, Evaluation, and Open Challenges
- 2025DP2Unlearning: An Efficient and Guaranteed Unlearning Framework for LLMs
- 2026Less is More: Geometric Unlearning for LLMs with Minimal Data Disclosure
- 2024Unveiling Entity-Level Unlearning for Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Analysis
- 2024Towards Robust and Parameter-Efficient Knowledge Unlearning for LLMs
- 2026From Anchors to Supervision: Memory-Graph Guided Corpus-Free Unlearning for Large Language Models