Multimodal LLM Augmented Reasoning for Interpretable Visual Perception Analysis
On the map: LLM reasoning → Multimodal reasoning
Abstract (arXiv)
In this paper, we advance the study of AI-augmented reasoning in the context of Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), psychology and cognitive science, focusing on the critical task of visual perception. Specifically, we investigate the applicability of Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) in this domain. To this end, we leverage established principles and explanations from psychology and cognitive science related to complexity in human visual perception. We use them as guiding principles for the MLLMs to compare and interprete visual content. Our study aims to benchmark MLLMs across various explainability principles relevant to visual perception. Unlike recent approaches that primarily employ advanced deep learning models to predict complexity metrics from visual content, our work does not seek to develop a mere new predictive model. Instead, we propose a novel annotation-free analytical framework to assess utility of MLLMs as cognitive assistants for HCI tasks, using visual perception as a case study. The primary goal is to pave the way for principled study in quantifying and evaluating the interpretability of MLLMs for applications in improving human reasoning capability and uncovering biases in existing perception datasets annotated by humans.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Multimodal reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. Builds on 18 of its 73 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2025.
Builds on
18 of 73 references.
References · 18
- 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
- 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2023BLIP-2: Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training with Frozen Image Encoders and Large Language Modelscited by 6,137
- 2022Flamingo: a Visual Language Model for Few-Shot Learningcited by 4,386
- 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
- 2024Gemini 1.5: Unlocking multimodal understanding across millions of tokens of contextcited by 3,224
- 2023Qwen-VL: A Versatile Vision-Language Model for Understanding, Localization, Text Reading, and Beyondcited by 2,224
- 2021LAION-400M: Open Dataset of CLIP-Filtered 400 Million Image-Text Pairscited by 1,555
- 2023ShareGPT4V: Improving Large Multi-Modal Models with Better Captionscited by 1,005
- 2023Gemini: A Family of Highly Capable Multimodal Modelscited by 872
- 2023EVA-CLIP: Improved Training Techniques for CLIP at Scalecited by 798
6 more
- 2024DeepSeek-VL: Towards Real-World Vision-Language Understandingcited by 733
- 2023MiniGPT-v2: large language model as a unified interface for vision-language multi-task learningcited by 625
- 2023PaLI-X: On Scaling up a Multilingual Vision and Language Modelcited by 255
- 2024Evaluating Human Alignment and Model Faithfulness of LLM Rationalecited by 12
- 2018SAVOIAS: A Diverse, Multi-Category Visual Complexity Datasetcited by 6
- 2024Prompting the Unknown: Understanding Response Uncertainty in Large Language Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025From Perception to Cognition: A Survey of Vision-Language Interactive Reasoning in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025Diagnosing Visual Reasoning: Challenges, Insights, and a Path Forward
- 2026From Structure to Synergy: A Survey of Vision-Language Perception Paradigm Evolution in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025A Cognitive Paradigm Approach to Probe the Perception-Reasoning Interface in VLMs
- 2025Beyond Seeing: Evaluating Multimodal LLMs on Tool-Enabled Image Perception, Transformation, and Reasoning
- 2025VERIFY: A Benchmark of Visual Explanation and Reasoning for Investigating Multimodal Reasoning Fidelity
- 2026Mind's Eye: A Benchmark of Visual Abstraction, Transformation and Composition for Multimodal LLMs
- 2025Visual Room 2.0: Seeing is Not Understanding for MLLMs