Emergence of Computational Structure in a Neural Network Physics Simulator
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Neural networks often have identifiable computational structures - components of the network which perform an interpretable algorithm or task - but the mechanisms by which these emerge and the best methods for detecting these structures are not well understood. In this paper we investigate the emergence of computational structure in a transformer-like model trained to simulate the physics of a particle system, where the transformer's attention mechanism is used to transfer information between particles. We show that (a) structures emerge in the attention heads of the transformer which learn to detect particle collisions, (b) the emergence of these structures is associated to degenerate geometry in the loss landscape, and (c) the dynamics of this emergence follows a power law. This suggests that these components are governed by a degenerate "effective potential". These results have implications for the convergence time of computational structure within neural networks and suggest that the emergence of computational structure can be detected by studying the dynamics of network components.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 57 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2025.
Builds on
24 of 57 references.
References · 24
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!cited by 1,154
- 2022In-context Learning and Induction Headscited by 964
- 2020Learning to Simulate Complex Physics with Graph Networkscited by 880
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 839
- 2021How Attentive are Graph Attention Networks?cited by 835
- 2024Sleeper Agents: Training Deceptive LLMs that Persist Through Safety Trainingcited by 529
- 2018A Mean Field View of the Landscape of Two-Layers Neural Networkscited by 466
- 2014The Loss Surfaces of Multilayer Networkscited by 280
- 2023Removing RLHF Protections in GPT-4 via Fine-Tuningcited by 171
- 2020Learning to Control PDEs with Differentiable Physicscited by 132
- 2015Statistical physics of inference: Thresholds and algorithmscited by 128
12 more
- 2020The Early Phase of Neural Network Trainingcited by 115
- 2017Critical Learning Periods in Deep Neural Networkscited by 79
- 2022Formal Algorithms for Transformerscited by 72
- 2018A jamming transition from under- to over-parametrization affects loss landscape and generalizationcited by 67
- 2018The jamming transition as a paradigm to understand the loss landscape of deep neural networkscited by 62
- 2024Language Models Resist Alignment: Evidence From Data Compressioncited by 53
- 2023The Local Learning Coefficient: A Singularity-Aware Complexity Measurecited by 51
- 2020Deep Learning is Singular, and That's Goodcited by 49
- 2024Differentiation and Specialization of Attention Heads via the Refined Local Learning Coefficientcited by 40
- 2023Dynamical versus Bayesian Phase Transitions in a Toy Model of Superpositioncited by 29
- 2023Graph Neural Network-based surrogate model for granular flowscited by 16
- 2024Critical Learning Periods: Leveraging Early Training Dynamics for Efficient Data Pruningcited by 10
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.
1 paper.
- 2025Influence Dynamics and Stagewise Data Attributioncited by 7
- 2025Influence Dynamics and Stagewise Data Attribution14 Oct 2025