Discrimination-free Insurance Pricing with Privatized Sensitive Attributes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fairness has become an important concern in insurance pricing as insurers increasingly rely on machine learning models to predict expected losses. At the same time, regulatory and privacy constraints often restrict insurers' ability to access or use sensitive attributes such as gender or race. Recent actuarial research addresses fairness in this context through the concept of the discrimination-free premium, which removes both the direct and indirect effects of sensitive attributes while preserving actuarial consistency. However, implementing this approach typically requires access to the sensitive attributes themselves, which may not be available in practice. This paper studies the estimation of discrimination-free insurance premiums when sensitive attributes are observed only in privatized or noise-perturbed form. We consider a multi-party data setting in which insurers observe non-sensitive attributes and outcomes, while a trusted third party holds privatized sensitive attributes generated through a privacy mechanism. Within this framework, we develop statistical methods for estimating discrimination-free premiums using only the privatized attributes. We study two settings of practical relevance: when the privacy mechanism is known and when its noise level is unknown. For both cases, we establish theoretical guarantees for the proposed estimators. Numerical experiments and empirical applications demonstrate that the proposed approach enables fair insurance pricing while respecting privacy and regulatory constraints.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Apr 2025.
Builds on
21 of 59 references.
References · 21
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,007
- 2017Counterfactual Fairnesscited by 804
- 2016Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approachcited by 665
- 2018A Reductions Approach to Fair Classificationcited by 587
- 2016Fairness Beyond Disparate Treatment & Disparate Impact: Learning Classification without Disparate Mistreatmentcited by 369
- 2018Empirical Risk Minimization under Fairness Constraintscited by 226
- 2018A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learningcited by 208
- 2019Fair Regression: Quantitative Definitions and Reduction-based Algorithmscited by 168
- 2021Towards a Unified Framework for Fair and Stable Graph Representation Learningcited by 128
- 2019Learning Optimal and Fair Decision Trees for Non-Discriminative Decision-Makingcited by 75
- 2020Fair Learning with Private Demographic Datacited by 46
- 2019Fair Data Adaptation with Quantile Preservationcited by 30
9 more
- 2020Mitigating Bias in Set Selection with Noisy Protected Attributescited by 29
- 2020Group-level Fairness Maximization in Online Bipartite Matchingcited by 14
- 2016Iterative Orthogonal Feature Projection for Diagnosing Bias in Black-Box Modelscited by 12
- 2017Optimized Data Pre-Processing for Discrimination Preventioncited by 12
- 2022A Fair Pricing Model via Adversarial Learningcited by 7
- 2023When Fair Classification Meets Noisy Protected Attributescited by 6
- 2022A multi-task network approach for calculating discrimination-free insurance pricescited by 4
- 2022A Discussion of Discrimination and Fairness in Insurance Pricingcited by 4
- 2024AI, insurance, discrimination and unfair differentiation. An overview and research agendacited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.
- 2026α-Fair Insurance Pricing: A Fairness Continuumcited by 0
- 2026α-Fair Insurance Pricing: A Fairness Continuum12 Jun 2026