Sub-optimality of the Separation Principle for Quadratic Control from Bilinear Observations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We consider the problem of controlling a linear dynamical system from bilinear observations with minimal quadratic cost. Despite the similarity of this problem to standard linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) control, we show that when the observation model is bilinear, neither does the Separation Principle hold, nor is the optimal controller affine in the estimated state. Moreover, the cost-to-go is non-convex in the control input. Hence, finding an analytical expression for the optimal feedback controller is difficult in general. Under certain settings, we show that the standard LQG controller locally maximizes the cost instead of minimizing it. Furthermore, the optimal controllers (derived analytically) are not unique and are nonlinear in the estimated state. We also introduce a notion of input-dependent observability and derive conditions under which the Kalman filter covariance remains bounded. We illustrate our theoretical results through numerical experiments in multiple synthetic settings.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2025.
Builds on
7 of 24 references.
References · 7
- 2019Learning Linear Dynamical Systems with Semi-Parametric Least Squarescited by 58
- 2024Learning Linear Dynamics from Bilinear Observationscited by 6
- 2014Semidefinite Programming Approach to Gaussian Sequential Rate-Distortion Trade-offscited by 4
- 2019System Level Synthesiscited by 3
- 2015Rank deficiency of Kalman error covariance matrices in linear time-varying system with deterministic evolutioncited by 2
- 2023Minimax Linear Optimal Control of Positive Systemscited by 1
- 2025Probabilistic Formulations for System Identification of Linear Dynamics with Bilinear Observation Modelscited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.