Trajectory Encoding Temporal Graph Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Temporal Graph Networks (TGNs) have demonstrated significant success in dynamic graph tasks such as link prediction and node classification. Both tasks comprise transductive settings, where the model predicts links among known nodes, and in inductive settings, where it generalises learned patterns to previously unseen nodes. Existing TGN designs face a dilemma under these dual scenarios. Anonymous TGNs, which rely solely on temporal and structural information, offer strong inductive generalisation but struggle to distinguish known nodes. In contrast, non-anonymous TGNs leverage node features to excel in transductive tasks yet fail to adapt to new nodes. To address this challenge, we propose Trajectory Encoding TGN (TETGN). Our approach introduces automatically expandable node identifiers (IDs) as learnable temporal positional features and performs message passing over these IDs to capture each node's historical context. By integrating this trajectory-aware module with a standard TGN using multi-head attention, TETGN effectively balances transductive accuracy with inductive generalisation. Experimental results on three real-world datasets show that TETGN significantly outperforms strong baselines on both link prediction and node classification tasks, demonstrating its ability to unify the advantages of anonymous and non-anonymous models for dynamic graph learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2025.
Builds on
26 of 37 references.
References · 26
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2016Semi-Supervised Classification with Graph Convolutional Networkscited by 11,361
- 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,923
- 2017Inductive Representation Learning on Large Graphscited by 6,320
- 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
- 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
- 2018Relational inductive biases, deep learning, and graph networkscited by 1,360
- 2016Geometric deep learning: going beyond Euclidean datacited by 1,048
- 2018Weisfeiler and Leman Go Neural: Higher-order Graph Neural Networkscited by 881
- 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 530
- 2020Graph Neural Networks in Recommender Systems: A Surveycited by 494
14 more
- 2020Inductive Representation Learning on Temporal Graphscited by 462
- 2019Predicting Dynamic Embedding Trajectory in Temporal Interaction Networkscited by 448
- 2021Inductive Representation Learning in Temporal Networks via Causal Anonymous Walkscited by 193
- 2023Towards Better Dynamic Graph Learning: New Architecture and Unified Librarycited by 157
- 2023Do We Really Need Complicated Model Architectures For Temporal Networks?cited by 143
- 2020Foundations and modelling of dynamic networks using Dynamic Graph Neural Networks: A surveycited by 124
- 2018DynGEM: Deep Embedding Method for Dynamic Graphscited by 102
- 2022Provably expressive temporal graph networkscited by 56
- 2022TREND: TempoRal Event and Node Dynamics for Graph Representation Learningcited by 50
- 2021Dynamic Network Embedding Surveycited by 44
- 2024Long Range Propagation on Continuous-Time Dynamic Graphscited by 28
- 2019E-LSTM-D: A Deep Learning Framework for Dynamic Network Link Predictioncited by 24
- 2021Graph-based Deep Learning for Communication Networks: A Surveycited by 21
- 2025A Survey of Link Prediction in Temporal Networkscited by 6
Built on by
Not cited yet.