mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Misleading Queries to Accurate Answers: A Three-Stage Fine-Tuning Method for LLMs

arXiv 2504.11277 ↗First posted 15 Apr 2025cs.CLcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models (LLMs) exhibit excellent performance in natural language processing (NLP), but remain highly sensitive to the quality of input queries, especially when these queries contain misleading or inaccurate information. Existing methods focus on correcting the output, but they often overlook the potential of improving the ability of LLMs to detect and correct misleading content in the input itself. In this paper, we propose a novel three-stage fine-tuning method that enhances the ability of LLMs to detect and correct misleading information in the input, further improving response accuracy and reducing hallucinations. Specifically, the three stages include (1) training LLMs to identify misleading information, (2) training LLMs to correct the misleading information using built-in or external knowledge, and (3) training LLMs to generate accurate answers based on the corrected queries. To evaluate our method, we conducted experiments on three datasets for the hallucination detection task and the question answering~(QA) task, as well as two datasets containing misleading information that we constructed. The experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly improves the accuracy and factuality of LLM responses, while also enhancing the ability to detect hallucinations and reducing the generation of hallucinations in the output, particularly when the query contains misleading information.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 21 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 15 Apr 2025.

Builds on

21 of 36 references.

References · 21

  1. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  3. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,170
  4. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,442
  5. 2021TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoodscited by 2,975
  6. 2023Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 2,212
  7. 2018CommonsenseQA: A Question Answering Challenge Targeting Commonsense Knowledgecited by 1,822
  8. 2020BLEURT: Learning Robust Metrics for Text Generationcited by 1,203
  9. 2019Adversarial NLI: A New Benchmark for Natural Language Understandingcited by 807
  10. 2020KILT: a Benchmark for Knowledge Intensive Language Taskscited by 573
  11. 2024When Can LLMs Actually Correct Their Own Mistakes? A Critical Survey of Self-Correction of LLMscited by 240
  12. 2023Can LLM-Generated Misinformation Be Detected?cited by 177
9 more
  1. 2024Modeling Future Conversation Turns to Teach LLMs to Ask Clarifying Questionscited by 76
  2. 2022CLAM: Selective Clarification for Ambiguous Questions with Generative Language Modelscited by 69
  3. 2024Large Language Models have Intrinsic Self-Correction Abilitycited by 46
  4. 2023Disinformation Detection: An Evolving Challenge in the Age of LLMscited by 41
  5. 2024Large Language Models Can Self-Correct with Key Condition Verificationcited by 39
  6. 2024Truth-Aware Context Selection: Mitigating Hallucinations of Large Language Models Being Misled by Untruthful Contextscited by 15
  7. 2024Large Language Models are Skeptics: False Negative Problem of Input-conflicting Hallucinationcited by 4
  8. 2023Semantic-aware Contrastive Learning for More Accurate Semantic Parsingcited by 2
  9. 2018Word Embedding based Edit Distancecited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.