mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Physical Scales Matter: The Role of Receptive Fields and Advection in Satellite-Based Thunderstorm Nowcasting with Convolutional Neural Networks

arXiv 2504.09994 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2025physics.ao-ph cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The focus of nowcasting development is transitioning from physically motivated advection methods to purely data-driven Machine Learning (ML) approaches. Nevertheless, recent work indicates that incorporating advection into the ML value chain has improved skill for radar-based precipitation nowcasts. However, the generality of this approach and the underlying causes remain unexplored. This study investigates the generality by probing the approach on satellite-based thunderstorm nowcasts for the first time. Resorting to a scale argument, we then put forth an explanation when and why skill improvements can be expected. In essence, advection guarantees that thunderstorm patterns relevant for nowcasting are contained in the receptive field at long forecast times. To test our hypotheses, we train ResU-Nets solving segmentation tasks with lightning observations as ground truth. The input of the Baseline Neural Network (BNN) are short time series of multispectral satellite imagery and lightning observations, whereas the Advection-Informed Neural Network (AINN) additionally receives the Lagrangian persistence nowcast of all input channels at the desired forecast time. Overall, we find only a minor skill improvement of the AINN over the BNN when considering fully averaged scores. However, assessing skill conditioned on forecast time and advection speed, we demonstrate that our scale argument correctly predicts the onset of skill improvement of the AINN over the BNN after 2h forecast time. We confirm that, generally, advection becomes gradually more important with longer forecast times and higher advection speeds. Our work accentuates the importance of considering and incorporating the underlying physical scales when designing ML-based forecasting models.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 72 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2025.

Builds on

13 of 72 references.

References · 13

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,305
  3. 2015Convolutional LSTM Network: A Machine Learning Approach for Precipitation Nowcastingcited by 1,436
  4. 2017Understanding the Effective Receptive Field in Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 553
  5. 2017Road Extraction by Deep Residual U-Netcited by 333
  6. 2021Skillful Precipitation Nowcasting using Deep Generative Models of Radarcited by 311
  7. 2022Medical Image Segmentation Review: The success of U-Netcited by 191
  8. 2021PredRNN: A Recurrent Neural Network for Spatiotemporal Predictive Learningcited by 182
  9. 2020SmaAt-UNet: Precipitation Nowcasting using a Small Attention-UNet Architecturecited by 71
  10. 2023Latent diffusion models for generative precipitation nowcasting with accurate uncertainty quantificationcited by 56
  11. 2020A review of radar-based nowcasting of precipitation and applicable machine learning techniquescited by 19
  12. 2021A Spatial-temporal Graph Deep Learning Model for Urban Flood Nowcasting Leveraging Heterogeneous Community Featurescited by 13
1 more
  1. 2022Seamless lightning nowcasting with recurrent-convolutional deep learningcited by 5

Built on by

Not cited yet.