mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning to Erase Private Knowledge from Multi-Documents for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models

arXiv 2504.09910 ↗First posted 14 Apr 2025cs.CLcited by 2

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Privacy and security of RAG

Abstract (arXiv)

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) is a promising technique for applying LLMs to proprietary domains. However, retrieved documents may contain sensitive knowledge, posing risks of privacy leakage in generative results. Thus, effectively erasing private information from retrieved documents is a key challenge for RAG. Unlike traditional text anonymization, RAG should consider: (1) the inherent multi-document reasoning may face de-anonymization attacks; (2) private knowledge varies by scenarios, so users should be allowed to customize which information to erase; (3) preserving sufficient publicly available knowledge for generation tasks. This paper introduces the privacy erasure task for RAG and proposes Eraser4RAG, a private knowledge eraser which effectively removes user-defined private knowledge from documents while preserving sufficient public knowledge for generation. Specifically, we first construct a global knowledge graph to identify potential knowledge across documents, aiming to defend against de-anonymization attacks. Then we randomly split it into private and public sub-graphs, and fine-tune Flan-T5 to rewrite the retrieved documents excluding private triples. Finally, PPO algorithm optimizes the rewriting model to minimize private triples and maximize public triples retention. Experiments on four QA datasets demonstrate that Eraser4RAG achieves superior erase performance than GPT-4o.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Privacy and security of RAG, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 4 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Apr 2025.

Builds on

4 of 39 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024Mitigating the Privacy Issues in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) via Pure Synthetic Data20 Jun

Other references · 3

  1. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  2. 2019Fine-Tuning Language Models from Human Preferencescited by 2,150
  3. 2024IncogniText: Privacy-enhancing Conditional Text Anonymization via LLM-based Private Attribute Randomizationcited by 23

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2026: 2.

2 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Pirates of the RAG: Adaptively Attacking LLMs to Leak Knowledge Bases
  2. 2025Private-RAG: Answering Multiple Queries with LLMs while Keeping Your Data Private
  3. 2024Privacy-Preserving Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Differential Privacy
  4. 2024RAG with Differential Privacy
  5. 2026Security and Privacy in Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Architectures, Threats, Defenses, and Future Directions for Building Trustworthy Systems
  6. 2025Fine-Grained Privacy Extraction from Retrieval-Augmented Generation Systems via Knowledge Asymmetry Exploitation
  7. 2025Exposing Privacy Risks in Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  8. 2025RAG Security and Privacy: Formalizing the Threat Model and Attack Surface